Search results

I was trading before... so I will write this more clearly. Please provide the exact statement or data that you see to support your statement about 60 day lockdowns. you keep acting like Prado supports your position... When he calls your position mistaken. 2c... the scenario says lockdown...

so you are leading with a scary stat... but you have no science, to indicate this current situation is worse than what will happen in the future when the lockdown would be ended. (under your preferred scenario) I grant that high risk deaths suck... but... as you know i have been arguing that...

and how do you know a stay at home order for low risk groups would have better overall results... what are you measuring how are you measuring are you considering the overall negatives from a shutdown are you factoring in... what will happen when the stay at home order is eventually lifted...

I already played that game with you and I explained that prado presented the stats and the stats and that if you look a them you realize that the low risk group should be out at 30 days or less because most likely that would result in lower total deaths and depression and everything negative...

Noem said a stay-at-home order wouldn't have made a difference in Sioux Falls because the plant would have remained open as part of a critical infrastructure business. as if... meat packing is not essential...

gwb brought up meat packing...not I... I responded... then you wrote the quote below. . and now you got nothing when I asked for some useful thought from you. by the way... the governor... addressed social distancing in the article. “We already have cut our peak projections by 75 percent...

ok you snarky low IQ Dnc talking points troll... you were the idiot who brought up a meat packing plant which would likely not have been closed because it is essential. That was fucking stupid. 1. Tell us about the local community spread. 2. Tell how a lockdown now for low risk groups is so...

1. Show me where Prado said start with a 60 day lockdown... that conflicts with the abstract and his summary. 2. R0 is based state when all individuals are susceptible. But... when many people already have immunities the effective R0 of low risk groups would naturally be lower. That is...

No one is saying we are going to eradicate Covid with testing and tracing. We need to know stats and make decisions based on science... I agree. We need to know what is happening with low risk groups. What is the effective R0 with low risk people There is no science based reason that been...

R0 models based on what is happening with the sick group... mean nothing at this time. We need to know what is happening in a low risk population to make any science based decisions regarding being open or shut with respect to low risk groups.

read the article numbnuts... meat packing plants everywhere have outbreaks.. the virus is everywhere... social distancing does not make it go away. it just stalls it absent 100 percent lockdown. it seems most of you lefties don't have the brain power to think in systems.. you just like to...

so we stay collapsed for 18 months til we have a cure... are you thinking clearly? The virus will be passed sooner or later... later is not better absent a cure. low risk people have to take the risk while hospitals are empty. high risk people stay in lock down til there is a cure or we have...

from the article... common sense... below... why the hell are we locking down low risk groups when there is no solution on the horizon.... === Principal Lisa Norming said it was vital for her students' health to be able to come to school. "It means a huge deal," she said. "It's about...

What is the point of bringing up a meat packing plant. You think govts should shut down food production? Are you say food production is not essential work? They work pretty close together and the stat I saw was over 2200 meat production plant employees around the country have tested...

Seriously... using statistics someone show me that this lockdown is useful for low risk groups when many hospitals are half empty and laying off staff. 1. Initially we were told the shutdown was to flatten the curve for hospital beds. 2. Somehow that has morphed into prevent exposure. Can I...

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, a Republican and the governor of one of just a handful of states that has not issued a statewide lockdown order, told Breitbart News exclusively on Wednesday her state is winning the war against the coronavirus without the extreme and draconian measures some other...

because everything you said does not apply to this situation. The employee is given the option to work. The social policies supporting OSHA regulations are worlds different... Employers can be held responsible for failing to exercise reasonable care... or the proper due diligence...

If that is true... and it it can do substantial damage to low risk groups... that changes the risk reward scenarios. damn it.

that is the problem with thinking the lock down of low risk groups is a good thing. If we don't create a cure or a therapy... it may only delay the inevitable without much benefit.

Companies should be immune from suits (per legislation) but the employee should be given the option to not work. (probably without pay)