Search results

:confused:

Excellent insight Pabst. And for those that don't know it, a successful strategic military plan for Afghanistan will call for a much different operation than the one that we ( and most Americans ) have become accustomed to in Iraq. Afghanistan is a WHOLE different animal and ballgame. And...

First off, the word is INCOMPETENT. There is no letter "A". Second of all, you make a rather absurd ASSUMPTION in thinking that Obama "follows each step of Congress". How anyone can actually make such a claim when the President-elect has not even been sworn into office yet, is ridiculous...

What do you expect from yet another incompetent Bush appointee? How many have there been over the past 8 years . . . from Donald Rumsfeld to Michael Chertoff to Pat Wood at FERC, to John Reich at the Office of Thrift Supervision, Christopher Cox at the SEC, Gale Norton at the Interior...

Yeah . . . I guess that's why he has directed Robert Gates to develop a military strategy to increase troop presence in Afghanistan by 100% It's also why he appointed 1997 Noble Prize winner and Director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Steven Chu as Secretary of Energy. Yep, no...

It stands for the year that I first stepped onto a commodity trading floor as a member.

It's pretty absurd. Especially given the fact that I had asked Gnome ( a Veteran ) what he thought of Obama's appointments of Robert Gates to Secretary of Defense, General Jim Jones to head up the NSA, and former Army Chief of Staff, General Eric Shinseki to preside over the VA. He replied...

Once again, you show yourself making a most absurd assumption . . . thinking that appointments of center-right cabinet members have anything to do with "keeping people happy". The guy won in a LANDSLIDE and had a mandate to pretty much appoint whoever he wished. Why he needed to "keep people...

Exactly. Just another reason why people in the hedge-fund community questioned why he wouldn't be running his own hedge-fund ( with the performance and management fees attached ) if his performance was really that outstanding. In other words, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Yes, your spelling is horrible.

Also keep in mind that ( given volume ) you can "negotiate" the advertised flat-rates even lower with the likes of Ameritrade and others.

Which "logic" is that that you speak of? Your FAILED logic that claimed that the High Court is the de-facto body for determining a President's elibigility for office . . . or how it is that "Photo-Shop" can now produce "raised" State seals??? Is that why you continue to avoid answering my...

I believe that the "Good Samaritan" law also applies to cases not having to do with an injury accident, but also to situations arising from cleaning-up toxic waste and pollution in the environment. For example, let's say that there is an old gold mine in your county that continues to leak...

Why is it that you avoided answering the above questions? Do you suffer from ADD, or when you are shown to be totally incapable of supporting an argument with FACTS, you simply resort to posting "Obama Lover" posters? How old are you? Did you ever graduate from a 4 year college? Still...

You consider yourself a REALIST? That's funny . . . What FACTS in evidence have you presented in this thread?

Typical rant by a RACIST. No facts . . . just absurdity after absurdity. Not surprising. You were DONE as soon as I showed how absurd and ignorant your claim about the High Court being in THE de-facto position to determine a candidate's Presidential eligibility. Have a nice day, Mr...

Yes, I am well aware who FactCheck is affiliated with, but at least they provided some photos ( with a raised State seal ) whereas you have PROVIDED ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, as usual. By the way, since when does "Photo-Shop" allow one to re-create "raised" State seals? And since when did the...

Once again, you present "failed-logic" due to your total lack of understanding of how the High Court works. It is NOT up to them to make a decision on a candidate's eligibility for President. But for some bizarre reason, you are unable to comprehend that fact. I guess that if you think...

Once again, not one point or statement based in FACT by you. Congratulations! :D

Once again, your claims are proven to be WRONG. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html