Search results

...good boy Again?.. Big Bang euphemism ......fetch

Nevertheless, what you're saying is very dumb and the laws of physics do, irrespective of your intense disproval, allow a universe to begin from nothing.

No, that's what you seem to think, 'everyone else' can see how scientific theory is not just theory. Including Websters apparently

Good of you to acknowledge it. But tell me, if not obvious, who or what would lead you to think scientific theory, is ever just theory? The scientific explanation for a universe to begin from nothing is going to be a lot more than just theory, especially when considering; the laws of physics...

Here boy .... science makes mini mini big bangs conditions present at the start of the universe re-produced amount of dark energy known euphemism ... jump TraderZzz.. good troll ...jump....

Nope, that's just as bad if not worse than regurgitating those dumb links, which also showed how little you know. Obviously you haven't a clue about dark energy, Big Bangs or euphemisms, or you wouldn't have to rely on insult so much. No surprises then.

Simply not so. A scientific theory is never just a theory. Were it just a theory, it wouldn't be scientific theory. Bit obvious really. So what's your real beef with this. Apart from being purposely obtuse (or otherwise)?

You can keep wetting your pants like that but it won't change a thing. Scientists do know how much dark energy, Mini Big Bangs have been made and they do produce conditions same that would have been present at the start of the universe. You couldn't school fish and you're sure not going...

Already said, a scientific theory is never just a theory. You just don't get it, or don't want to.

No, I'm saying it's either in ignorance or deceit that anyone would suggest scientific theories are unproven in false comparison to "not the same thing as proven laws or facts of absolute certainty", or infer that they are just a theory, when in fact they are always far from both those...

How very gay:D I understand you have no ground to stand on, nor have any sense of humor , so you seem to feel a strong need to argue by ad hominem and by repeating your mistakes in regurgitated links. Acting like a little child, you're angry that scientists know how much dark energy there...

Scientists know how much dark energy. And you're obviously very pissed about that.

Clearly Lucrum still doesn't get that. You might start with metaphysics, my point being that you always need do the science to go any further. That's not "all it represents" Science is more than just metaphysics.

You're doing it again. After what you've said and are still saying above, it's difficult to believe that's true.

Pathetic as ever, so what all this is really about is, you can't get over the fact that you didn't realize it's known how much dark energy there is. Well now it's apparent neither did you know what is meant by big bang. But you self-importantly do know what "absolutely did not happen"! So...

Yes, but as my point with Lucrum, attaching phrases like " that's all it represents" and "it's only a theory" , are unmistakably not true representations of science. Whether it's the science which is mathematics, or the science which is physics, they are obviously much more than that suggests...

By your own definition then, Big bang is a euphemism. It's an inoffensive term replacing "God did it", which of course is highly offensive to the intellect. Big Bang whether you like it or not, is also a figure of speech for scientific explanations of events which are understood to have...

Being a science dealing with the logic of quantity, shape and arrangement, they are much more than that!

Energy, space/time is not nothing. Add an omnipotent dio di tutti dii and you started with 2 somethings and an imaginary friend. ....however, the laws of physics don't allow for that. Yet the laws of physics do allow for a universe to begin without any of it. :p

Nice to see some honesty dude. Right. So it's only mathematics then.