Search results

What's that supposed to be, your concession? It's a piss poor argument in defence for Jesus the Jewish Wonder Worker.

You repeat your own altered versions of what people don't say. Just like those ancient christian interpolators, the truth comes secondary to your beliefs. jem vs. consciousness jem vs. sanity jem vs. rationality jem vs. reality

In ALL the voluminous historical records, there is no attestation whatsoever from any writer, recorder or scholar living at the time Christ is supposed to have lived. That is a big problem for christian apologetics - whether they be scholars or not, to get over. Considering the claims made...

It's been explained why your ridiculous comments hold no water. The only response you have is to keep repeating them. That's why you're an idiot. Correction, one reason.

What I am saying, you idiot, which should be perfectly obvious to all but the most dumb brained deceitful JC queers like yourself, is that Christian apologetic scholars never actually have had anything that can be rightly or honestly called historical evidence for your iron age boy friend savior.

Wallet, Despite the mass majority of historians and scholars at the time, who believed the opposite, it could be said Christians held fast to a minority view. Big difference is, I'm not using false claims to support my view.

The thing is, I think people like yourself , if you want to make claims that are untrue, will have to start to defend what is now being seen more widely in this age of information, as a crock. The problem with your argument is so obvious to anyone who considers it for one second, I wonder why...

The above quotation from the Antiquities is considered authentic in its entirety by almost all christian apologetic scholars, whose previous members of their ilk have already been caught red handed clumsily and condescendingly altering Josephus's text by inserting the word Christ where...

You pointed out false claims as evidence for a historical Jesus. That's what you did. I pointed out they were false. Nothing that you mentioned stands as historical evidence. Non of it can be verified or substantiated as having existed or taken place in the real world as distinct from being...

It's possible to go into detailed explanation why non of the names you give are accepted as providing historical evidence for a Jesus, but in my experience it's a waste of time to do that here on ET. The fact is, claims made for the historical Jesus have ALL been either uncorroborated...

Historians must base their claims on substantive corroborated verifiable evidence of the time, not on myth and legend in story form. It does of course take a lot more than making false or unsupportable claims and then calling people names for something or someone to become historical...

"I will never understand how..." ... purposely or just unable to? Evolution from simple to complex. Religion from complex to incredulity.

Apparently religion requires that you say the exact opposite to what is true in support of its beliefs, .

Around 50 AD... I have to agree, all accounts of Jesus are dated many decades or centuries later with no verifiable historical accounts whatsoever of the character's life or death. Jesus is myth wrapped up as history which your post most adequately confirms.

In the same way children might debate if Luke Skywalker was really the Son of Darth Vader.

Occasionally busying oneself with the hard of thinking like jem and peilthetraveler , is just one way some of us give back to society. :p

Good question..but I have an even better one... how do those skeptics explain a Platform 9¾ being in London, and in the exact area described in the Harry Potter Book?

Hawking indicates this Universe provides information to counter notions of fine tuning, without infinite other universes. “.. [the 1992 discovery of a planet orbiting a star other than the sun]. makes the coincidences of planetary conditions - the single Sun, the lucky combination of...

“Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist” “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the...

....it's wallstreet trying to crash wikelites