Search results

Like I said deceit boy, you'd deny deny deny, and you have. Screaming anything, no matter how ridiculous, is the basis of your argument for a creator of the universe. lol. This time it's about "fricken page numbers". So I give you the page number the volume and the publication, and then you...

Evolution designs. Whenever idea of design is looked at , observed and tested, scientifically, empirically, with prediction and proof , the 'programming' and the 'design' is always found to be completed in house by evolution . It's why biology, medicine and understanding of the world and...

Ok you have recovered to your normal standard of base insults. Well done. The quote comes directly from de Duve's book, all detail down to the page is provided, but that will never be enough for you. In truth nothing, will ever be enough as you have already shown time after time. You...

Are you feeling ok? You didn't use crude insult or name calling. There are none of the ignorant dishonest and deceitful accusations that are always in ALL your responses. You say " If at the end of my research" RESEARCH !? puleeze This is nothing to do with your so called research. I'm...

Lol kts, which part of that mess of redherrings strawman and false claims would warrant a response? Well, maybe if an IDer's responses to specific statements are reasonable, like for instance response to -Evolution is a Fact- I could maybe use them to field with..... Let's try. Prove...

"I don't believe you actually read what I said." I don't think you must understand what you said. Instead of rambling off into long rhetorical disconnects you might try to deal with what you did say. The credibility of your argument for intelligent design lies equally with the flat...

Again, I don't claim the quote out of context or half out of context. This is your trouble . The second time I’ve said to you, remember it took 4 or 5 goes before I could get you to spell the word cite correctly ….. The quote is not out of context…. it's fraudulent. Purposely...

I've heard the same argument from flat earthers . They just look at the near horizon and say no one can prove there is non flat earth.

You copied half the quote from a religious apologetics website to imply the opposite of what the quote actually said. Compounding your deceit by asking for a link to your own post. Now you are lying about your own credibility too.

I told you no such thing. I said you were purposely misinforming and therefore a fraud and a liar. You ignored your error and repeated posting an incomplete quote to misguide. Nothing to do with context.

What a load of rubbish. ID creationist codswallop to deny fact as if doing so was some sort of basis for wild speculation to assume a magic creator.

What facts do you think they are? Not those Evolutionary ones for some reason ?

The question hasn't changed.

You can't prove that.

Talk about overkill . You know, if that sentence could reproduce mutate and be subject to natural selection, I wouldn't even have had to remove the offending word. Subject to natural selection, it wouldn't have survived. My bad. I didn't notice I had included it. What is it ID'ers have...

My apologies trendlover. The word inanimate was not meant to be in there. I recall considering abiogenesis at the time I wrote and how the whole picture along with Evolution really does make a little more sense than an Invisible Designer Sky Pixie.

What is it ID'ers have against inanimate organisms that reproduce, mutate and are subject to natural selection simply showing the results of all that in designs and as a matter of fact? Why wouldn't that evolutionary process involve its own determination in outcome of shape pattern and design...

As the design you perceive and say cannot come about from anything other than an intelligent designer, that's creationism well enough. The blind denial of all that has been constantly observed, proven and understood in the sciences to argue intelligent design instead, requires the...

Actually, rationalists place the emphasis on observable facts. But you must never let the facts get in the way of intelligent design. Throwing some facts into your head and watching them assemble into conclusions will stop you getting yourself killed when crossing the street. Maybe you...

Intelligent Design is an extra step as it is not necessary and explains nothing. Considering the abundance of observable facts and so excluding metaphysical and mythical speculations, a rationalist would realize that. A creationist won’t