Search results

Well done Jem, another perfectly pathetic comment because you cannot support anything you say. You messed up right at the start so tried to change what I said, even though you must have known you can't. That' s the mentality of a creationist for you.

If you call chasing your own tail while defeating your own argument as slapping around then yes , that's exactly what you have been doing.

Creationists lol, you can even argue your own argument into a knot.

Then by all means allow me. Here's a video for your faith.

Quote from jem "and you also said... There is plenty of science to show how life can come from non life." "Lets stick to one of your statements you said there is plenty of science showing how life came from non life.." At first you managed to repeat the statement...

A scientific theory just doesn't need your faith.

Correct. Creationism both gets and goes nowhere.

Litmus test LOL. You really are too ridiculous. A troll would ignore a fact problematically standing against his flimsy anti-science attempt at an argument to ask faulty loaded questions like... "When did non life evolve into life." ...and then demand evidence for his nonsense. So you...

Note back to jem... No, this is certainly not a side issue. This is the issue. If you are not disputing the crucial organic compounds known as the building blocks of life, essential to all life on earth, can develop naturally on non living material, wtf is your problem exactly.? I stated...

You've demonstrated many times how you are incapable of quoting my statement word for word without changing adding or removing words from it. What is so wrong with you that you can't read, let alone understand what I have said? You are clearly terribly confused. Try it this way. Can the...

It means... ...you have no clue

Great, it was proven 60 years ago that organic compounds, the basic components present in all living things, can originate by natural chemical reaction, from in-organic non-living matter. That's Organic compounds from non-organic matter. Organic Compounds.... go look that up in your...

It means what it says. But if you want a magical video, try Harry Potter.

"God can't be reasoned into or out of existence because God simply exists or not." You’re trying to reason God can't be reasoned because God simply exists or not. That too might as well be the same peurile reason Bertrand's Teapot can't be reasoned. Trader666 ? Lol more like Grader000...

I think with your mentality you'd be better waiting for a cartoon or some simple pictures.

"There is know known pathway. " insults omitted Because it is already proven how amino acids, the essential building blocks for all life on earth, form from non organic material by natural chemical reaction unrelated to life itself, a pathway for 'non life to life' is obviously already...

bkveen3, Kowtowing is not my style. I just hope while you are submitting yourself to a self-serving ritual of subservience and superstition by praying to an imaginary tyrant, someone else is thinking for you.

You know what crummie, that's exactly the type of damn silly thing a Creationist would say. Are you going to out yourself soon?

Me to Donner: You can't define God into existence you chirp in with: Nor can you "reason" God out of existence... blindingly obviously then: You can't reason something out of existence that cannot be reasoned in. no surprise, here comes your next fatuous comment God can't be...

So now you've suddenly abandoned your own Nobel Prize winning example of science in the form of Dr Jack Szostak, for some totally non scientific entries in a couple of dictionaries. I'll trump your subjective dictionary definitions, which have no basis in science whatsoever for...