Search results

  1. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    You are always trying to assert Penrose is providing scientific information substantiating an appearance of fine tuning. He does no such thing. Neither does Collins. He is NOT providing or explaining any science which elaborates on an appearance of fine tuning. There is science which...
  2. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    There is no science to support what Collins says about fine tuning. He is not pretending there is. You're the one doing that. Regurgitating vids like a retard in full denial, which have already been refuted as being in any way supportive of your dumb argument, won't change that fact. There...
  3. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    What is wrong with you. There is no science to support what Collins says about fine tuning. He is not pretending there is. You're the one doing that.
  4. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    One problem has always been Jem, you are constantly trying to argue that a particular scientist says X...therefore everything else to do with X can be dismissed for no good reason. Collins has given his personal opinion in the world of religion for something called fine tuning. Collins has...
  5. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    Yet three more examples of why you've zero credibility. "Collins would expect science to continue to confirm the appearance of amazing fine tuning " Then according to what you say, by the same reasoning Collins would expect to confirm the amazing appearance of a flat earth. As for the...
  6. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    From what he says I think Collins knows full well that whatever magnificent revelations are to come about, they will as always, be in the science of the future, not out of blind unreasoning religious beliefs from the past.
  7. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    ....and another good example why you literally have no credibility.
  8. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    Refuted and debunked. All you can now think of is to repeat the same already refuted and debunked claim over and over again. Strike 1 Refuted and debunked. All you can now think of is to repeat the same already refuted and debunked claim over and over again. Strike 2 Refuted and debunked...
  9. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    Most things have the power to change lives What's your point? That religion has the power to change lives too, just as fascism through communism and every other political/belief in between? Making a statement then attaching the word religion to it, doesn't make the statement meaningful...
  10. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    It wasn't a question. Bad start. In fact I show literal inconsistency or contradiction, you deny everything and anything, turn everything and anything into absurdity, interpret everything and anything off the charts and commence the name calling and possibly use your sockpuppet again. No...
  11. S

    religion slowly dying in america. 32% now non religious. gallup poll

    You used a sockpuppet. You were caught red-handed. Then without any proper cause or reason, you start accusing others of using sockpuppets. It shows you up as a hypocrite and a liar. I have never used any other handle when addressing your interminable ignorant bullshit in ET. What...
  12. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    To keep the trading metaphor you introduced, curve fitting is not debating a nuance. Saying bad is good, wrong is right by interpreting what the bible says to what it doesn't, is delusion, or worse, deceit . That's biblebabble. The entire bible points to inconsistency and contradiction...
  13. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    Well the problem is, don't take offense because non intended, that's exactly what you sound like. Not a new set up, but studying the bible until you've curve fitted it, is no better No Wallet, there isn't just one interpretation. If there is, then it's your own. As I say, that is a big...
  14. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    "I repeat pick up a bible with a good study guide and STUDY IT." ..."and when you interpret it they same way I do, then you'll understand it properly" Can't you see the problem with that Wallet?
  15. S

    Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve

    Beer is older than 6000 years. Things have been getting slowly better for humans ever since.
  16. S

    religion slowly dying in america. 32% now non religious. gallup poll

    You used a sockpuppet. Then you accuse others of using sockpuppets. Never. You used a sockpuppet. Remember? I don't. One reason religion is declining might be because these days people can see more readily in open forums , the amount of deceit in religion, and in those like yourself...
  17. S

    religion slowly dying in america. 32% now non religious. gallup poll

    You only admitted to being screen name jem posting under screen name res judicata, after being caught red-handed. That's YOU using a sockpuppet. So the best you can think of is to babble on about real estate as if it has anything to do with confirming anything other than you're an idiot , and...
  18. S

    religion slowly dying in america. 32% now non religious. gallup poll

    It's a creationist's stock in trade. Have nothing, so project all the imbecility in the world onto others wherever they won't accept the bullshit. Made a sock puppet himself, got caught red handed and so went into a state of epileptic denial about logging on, taking the cringe factor...
  19. S

    religion slowly dying in america. 32% now non religious. gallup poll

    I apologize. I underestimated you. You're even more stupid than I ever imagined.
  20. S

    Trayvon Martin Incident: Facts vs. Distortion

    That’s the thing. You would. Same as flat earthers, creationists do find their vulgar, dishonest and irrational non-argument compelling.
Back
Top