Search results

Sounds like the Ed show:D An honest man running for the highest office. I am sure the secret service has already been employed.:)

Well, since you Appalachians don't know how to parse statements, you may not have noticed that I was very geographically specific, which would also infer cultural specificity. So yep, you are racist Lucrum, and your racism is cultural in nature, not biological. You are also homophobic. The...

George W. Bush is my response.

Since you are not in the military it does not surprise that you would take that statement out of context. Yes, if called upon to do so by the US government, I will defend the POTUS. That is an oath I have taken, and it does not go away simply because I am honorably discharged. The POTUS...

The GOP is in deep trouble either way. Their base does not want Romney, the mainline does not want Newt, not do they really want Paul, because they cannot control him. If they smarten up and take Paul, He takes Obama's youth vote and almost all independents. It's over. Anyone else will...

That because the liberal/conservative moniker is for us, not them. Nothing you did not know. It doesn't surprise me one bit. I used to always wonder why they would call the President, Mr. President instead of saying, President Clinton or President Bush, or President Obama. Now I understand that...

Now this might be something good. It will at least make things interesting:) Mittens IS the GOP candidate, one way or the other, just so you know though

Ah ha, so his literal statement was not to be taken literally, gotcha!:cool:

Okay, lol, you got me, so I will just have to move my gloating up one week. Sorry about that:D

Riiiiiight. I have never made inferences to all whites being a certain way. I have never said something like, "the whites" But I read, "the blacks", the darkies, references to monkeys, watermelon, fried chicken, you know, all those racist things that the poster knows is racist. So...

They have to support each other like for their positions are losing ones in ET and in the real world. Its funny really.

So a person start with a buck. With Oanda he can trade that buck. This is how one learns. You can work out all those variables, and you don't even have to risk what it cost to get a Big Mac.

Bob. Starting with fx, means a rookie trader cannot blow up. He can trade until he gets it right. Do you have a problem with that?

It is actually not new. Analysts as early as Gann and Wycoff would look at support and resistance and determine some rudimentary probability based on how often price respected that level.

Price and probability are one and the same if you look at the market in a complete package.

Hood has never piled on. I have been here a long time and he has never said a cross word to anyone. As a new trader, I, an old trader will give you some direction. Start at fx. Open an account with oanda. Fund it with whatever you are comfortable with losing. Learn price action...

I doubt you will find anyone here. Trend following can be learned with a bit of research free of charge. That said, since I do not know what is in them, he just might have some secret mojo that no else is aware of. Am I willing to pay to find out? No. This is strictly opinion of...

You are trying to make the simple complex. Dumb it down. Seriously. Just take it as it is, and go with that. ACD is a bias filter, it was not meant to be anything else.

I remember that too, he was the starter of the ADX thread here a few years ago. Something bad happened, so I would ask restraint. Please do not pile on.

Yup, it's that serious. Let's see when we here in the states put that together. We are usually the last to know anything, and when we do know, well, send the military.