Search results

yes but we can't speak the reality. Our liberal bretheren have won that battle along with convincing everyone that they all deserve equal economic outcomes regardless of ability. Too bad, I think real progress only comes when we take on reality and solve problems on their own terms.

All one has to do is look at the planet and see who has achieved intellectually and who builds the better civilizations. The science will take a back seat to politics I think.

Studies have been done but I don't care to look them up. Blacks from west africa, and west only, have evolved a higher density of fast twitch muscle fiber, and the have a slightly different bone structure than the rest of the planet. Fast twitch is ideal for short running events. East...

Do you know how many times this movie has played? For example: and yet we get headlines that we are at a 40 year crime low at the same time. It is some sort of delusional mental disorder that people believe we can change human nature and create a 0 violence utopia. The only...

I made it quite clear and directly to you, I was talking about the handgun ban in the UK in our side discussion. Now you make some irrelvenat reference to the OP? give it up, you lost. My opinion isn't conflicted at all, handgun control failed because culture is a stronger determinant than...

yes it is. an action is taken- handgun banning and confiscation, and we watch the reaction. The results are the crime stats, there isn't any other way to measure such things. When liberals made the law in the first place, were they not referring to the crime statisics in making their...

the biggest conspiracy wackos on here are the 9/11 inside job boys, and they tend to be lefties. You forgot a few catagories: Set C. Adherents to the liberal religion, very dogmatic, closed minded, all government is good, compassion is liberal government, Obama is transcendant, gays...

In other words gun control would work if were turned into one massive police state, and on that I agree. Gun control worked just fine in the soviet union and nazi germany.

Look, if you refuse to read then I'm gonna call you what you are- willfully retarded. I said HANDGUN CRIME ONLY when referring to handguns. Secondly, it does not matter if there was a crime spike, IN FACT it supports my assertion that crime is independent of guns, if you wanna argue that way...

what the hell you talking about, I called it a gun control experiment, now because you don't like the results you claim it is idealogy and some sort of statisical aberration. The fact is liberal idealogy says less guns equals less guns crime, period, with no claims whatsoever as to the absolute...

that's right jackwagon, you know full well what the point was but think that the 'CD' mistake invalidates it. Your super-simpleton econ 101 is not true in the absolute sense, it's easy to show that quite clearly, no need to try anything harder here. In fact it didn't take much trying at all...

You still don't understand, it doesn't matter what the absolute levels were. If I start with handgun level X and decrease it by law, no matter what X is, then liberal theory says handgun gun goes down. It went up, so either gun control doesn't work or liberal;s are wrong. You keep trying to...

So If I manufacture more CDs of a really bad movie, even though they may be already be in oversupply sitting on store shelves, I GUARANTEE that use will go up? Such oversimplistic notions of supply and demand/use were thrown out long ago. The fact that you find it 'obvious' is really funny.

I did answer my own argument, you however chose to create a different strawman argument then declare yourself correct in a rather 'loud' manner. Absolutely assinine, just pure raw human toolery.

You have convolved a few things here, read carefully. The handgun only portion was a point about gun control laws. The study on handgun crime was post 1997 and was discussing handguns only so your reference to other firearms and availability are not relevent. Handguns outlawed and...

It was a dumb question because it failed at addressing the reality. REQUIRING 'everyone' like kindergartners and prisoners to carry handguns is just one hell of a stupid proposition that NOBOBY is advocating. Requiring all suitable adults is again not even in the same galaxy as what anyone is...

From a guy who posted nothing empirically... sweden which has a gun ownership rate over 10 times UK's yet has a lower murder rate is not significant, britian confiscates handguns and yet handgun crime goes up is not significant- PROVE IT dumbass. You said you it wasn't significant so prove your...

In science we always say that asking the right question is important. I'm sorry but you have asked a very dumb question. Nobody is promoting, demanding, claiming such a 'right' etc. so it is a useless hypothetical, and you claim to have common sense.... your stupid arrogance is getting...

the ONLY way to scientifically answer the question of whether more guns means more homicides is to calculate a correlation between gun ownership and homicide rate. You have no empirical data to support you so you want to claim some sort of special weight be given to your intuition just because...

yes, the old when the data refutes you, then discredit the data. The trouble is you have nothing but your self proclaimed common sense and intelligence to replace it with. Sorry, you are just too stupid to be taken as some sort of authority on the issue. and here was you last sentence The...