Search results

No go ahead please. Don't censor yourself on my behalf anyway. I'll not respond to the completely irrational comments jem would be bound to make on the subject.

Any God who is supposed to be allowing free will by giving a choice to do good or evil, while giving no choice at all to innocent victims but to have evil done to them, is not worth Its salt.

EXACTLY? well, it's irrational. For instance, you seem to believe anyone who questions it has their panties in a wad.

All you have ever done is reprint what you've already posted. To someone like yourself who cannot ever be wrong, every argument against what you've posted which doesn't fit with your own personal religious beliefs you call bullshit. Every reference, every comment, every video - you have...

So why are you arguing with jem?

Endlessly repeating stuff already debunked just makes you an even bigger troll than you already are.

Well don't let Jem in, deal with this yourself.... If God was omnipotent and It wanted man to have free will, nothing need interfere. It follows that were God omnipotent and all loving, It must be able to arrange for both. Allowing two choices from many possibilities is not Free will. That's...

So the answer to my question is no, you do not have a sensible comment to make and will continue with the no substance childish insult approach. You've explained nothing. Referring to editorials you clearly don't understand and which do not show my statement to be incorrect in any case, is...

You should realize sooner or later everything you mention above is what you are doing.... except the explaining. You seem to be concluding there is something wrong with what I said but you don't seem able to say what. Here's my explain.... "Now what trouble is it you are having with...

So in the end, that's all you can really do.

So Black's Law is a "a brain dead troll loon" now is it? You do pathetic faster by each post. I've given reference to lower courts and in fact the Federal Court too has been used for precedent by the Supreme Court on questions of citizenship/ natural born citizen. Information is out...

No I don't think it fair. If you're not paying attention why post at all? I would have hoped at least you may have noticed responses to Jem's nonsense at least demonstrated he doesn't even have an argument.

Leftists? Grow up for goodness sake.. There is no sockpuppet here yet YOU were caught red handed using one. You hypocrite. Now what trouble is it you are having with string landscape not being itself a proposition for multiverse? Unless you can explain yourself, repeating the sentence...

You're telling me what I think at the same time as talking about entitlements to feel superior! Now that IS what's ironic. Yes that is a prime example of your ignorance. It's a correct statement. String Landscape is about the possibly infinite number of false vacuums (or vacua) in...

Court decision from trial level to circuit knows. The New York Chancery Court knows. The Supreme Court's use of the lower courts as precedent when handling citizenship eligibility knows. Common Law knows. Just as Black's Law Dictionary knows, where it unambiguously defines "Natural Born...

You seem to think talking like an idiot means you have an argument. It doesn't.

..whenever you post. You want me to show you what a vacua is. Why - what difference would it make? Of course none. Any facts or information which does not fit your ridiculous claim for a "Tuner" is rejected denied and interpreted to mean something it doesn't. You do that all the time...

You are ridiculous. You have to learn the science. Not what a dictionary, lol, or one particular scientist credible or not, may remark. Science isn't church where you do what the guy in the big dress tells you. That's what you do, and it's why you are so ill-informed. What's worse is...

You've drawn a conclusion on something I've not even said because you have Bible Block. To follow commandments, you know , something that is commanded, you can't both render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and render unto god what is god's, where god is already telling you not to do a...

So that's it. You can't or won't comprehend what I said because it shows the bible to be slanted against humane considerations coming first, and favoring overwhelming submissivness to imaginary ghosts and superstition above everything else. You got da bible block.