Search results

I hesitated to revive this thread because Tara has become the de facto leader of the B-Team by virtue of her youth and 21st century brilliance vice my old age and cultural recidivism. I only do so to share the results of Codified SCT for today (a cherry-picked day, to be sure, this IS about SCT...

Great analysis, 666, I agree completely. Supercilious comes to mind. Certainly what 50 years ago we called a psychopath, and which has been relentlessly softened over the years first to sociopath and now to antisocial personality. But oh, 666, I have BEGGED you in PMs to tell me your gender...

666, I still love you, BTW, no matter what your gender. Kindly tell a harmless old man what you heard in Jack's tone of voice. I believe I have already referenced "The Voice of Neurosis" here, a great book out of the '50's, but if not I will share my analysis of Jack's voice to fill in any holes...

"If after reading this you think I'm the fox, good luck!" Tara, I think you are a fox! Hypnotize me! But with a "z", not an "s", if you please. FWIW, I can attest to Jack's skill. Every once in a while he forgets that by attacking him I bring him converts, and he destroys me with NLP...

But why in this case? He can't get laid. He isn't trading so he can't make money. He gets little obvious adoration from it. Do you suppose it is just for FUN? Something to mentally jerk off over? An ego trip?

Tara, not to rush you, do keep your own pace, sorry I have ADD amongst other disorders, but when you are finished with your stately argument, kindly speculate WHY he does it. I mean, I have done it to get well laid, but one presumes that is not Jack's aim.

Jack hates this argument, but I have stuck by it over the years: SCT is not seamless at all, rather it is a collection of disparate connected edges. I also have argued that while no single element of SCT backtests with positive expectancy, magically, somehow in the ensemble, SCT works. Attached...

Pardon my reposting this from Neoxx's thread, but the complexity of SCT jargon, and the way Neoxx has add(l)ed to it are astonishing. But as always with SCT, it made me think: "What is MY vocabulary? Is it more or less complex? Am I just being a snot about it?" So here is mine: long short...

Attention whores will run naked screaming down the back alley if they have to. But I DO love him. When he is gone I'll be the oldest guy here. Then look out! I'll get me a new alias and suck in the noobs in a way Jack can only dream of.

Thanks, Bathrobe. I assume you trade in your lucky one. I always say "You aren't trading furiously enough if your frayed old K-Mart slippers don't stink!"

Thank you, Mom! And we'll eat our veggies, too!

And regarding the Hershey SW thread, I see 1000 monkeys with 1000 typewriters, but no Shakespeare yet. Otherwise they would have created code that looks like mine!

One does one's best for those less fortunate. BTW, it was a great relief to me to see that Todd is posting again. Can Jack be far behind? And I find myself becoming quite appreciative of the Trade Navigator charting several of the SCT gang are using. Maybe they'd like some stoplight code?

I check Iterative Refinement several times a day for several reasons: to see if I might learn something (I don't) to witness entropy's handiwork (SCT needs its Maxwell's demon, Spydie, back) and to admire Mr. Black's trades (I love to see a fellow SCT trader at work). But his trades...

For all three of you who stared in amazement at my latest results with chicken-fried SCT, I neglected to mention this version incorporates 14 distinctly different combinations of the most important states of velocitance, peakage, and volumicity as discussed earlier. Of course, with 24 such...

How about if we stick to IMpersonal attacks? You know, nuthin' persnal? Thank goodness you aren't offended by vaudeville, broad satire, slapstick and sarcasm.

Well, codifried SCT dint do tew bad terday. 29.16 net NQ points, 65% of the range. Not bad a-tall fer grossly overoptimized code. I have to hack it a lot during the day to get it that good, but hey, that's how SCT works! Don't like the results? Change the rules!

Hmmm. I suggest a moderating rule that you only delete posts for a complaint if the complainant is a POSTER on that thread. Otherwise the complainant can go elsewhere and screw himself. Especailly THIS thread. Who the hell posting here is going to be offended by ANYTHING posted here, haha!

What constitutes sabotage, BTW? Don't see that in the TOU, haha. I personally would object to the bad poetry.

Good point, 666! You should be able to say anything shitty over HERE that you want to. Tums, I urge you just to read and enjoy this thread but don't moderate it except for obscenity (well, really BAD obscenity). If you let the pond stagnate all the anti-Jacks will slither over here and leave the...