Search results

Farctals and Dackster, thanks for your support. Sadly, that now makes you members of the B-Team. You can never go back, never post in Journals. It is a lonely existence. I would say that you now have new friends, but, alas, we are all loners. To all, kindly stay tuned for Monday's Simplifried...

Now that you are suitably softened up, I must tell you that I am lowly incensed that you figured it out. Worse, you figured it out BETTER than I did! So you owe me the pseudocode in a PM. I must warn you, however, it doesn't ALWAYS work, or it would work always. That's why I have twelve...

MBS, there's an old racist joke, for which I am sure all will forgive me, but the punch line is apropos: Li'l Eva frens dey say: "Come walk wid us. We teech yo 'bouts mens! (Li'l Eva, she be jes tweve.) De first mans dey sees, wun girl say "HELLO 8-2!" Li'l Eva say, "Whut dat mene...

IMO if you list SCT precepts in order of impotence, the PV Relation is at the top, with channels, "guasians" and all the rest being secondary. Simplifried SCT is based solely on my Southern Engineering interpretation of the PV Relation.

Funny, MBroSet. I interviewed Rcanfiel at length over a year ago and his vocabulary, linguistic style and trading outlook are 180 from yours. Hard to mistake the two. MBS and Dackster, profitable trading systems are so dirt simple any fool could use them. That's why no one dares reveal them...

A literal interpretation of SCT leads one to construct the twelve systems depicted in the attachment. As you can see, only three of them worked Friday. But miraculously, mirabile dictu!, they all work in the ensemble. Such is Jack's genius! And lest you be tempted to think this post a jest, why...

Ah, yes, now don't I see. An optical delusion, like channels and guasians.

Thank you, Dackster. It is not east being an SCT trader here. But what is the "rule of 25", please?

System netted 30.39 NQ points today. Channels, volume, and Gaussians not shown for clarity. Times Pacific. Will post results each day. Anyone else trading NQ with pure SCT or a derivative is encouraged to post results. Attempted to share this with ET in Journals but not welcome there. Apologies...

Oops! Limey spelling! Yew jist doan lak Amuricuns! Yew lose munny oan ar flimsy papur ar sumpin'? Remember, wealth is rarely destroyed, it just changes hands. Oh, and the word "contributing" doesn't b'long in any of YOUR posts. You are just a bitter critciSer. BTW, the use of aliases is...

You are criticizing ME? Here are a few quotes from YOU: "He is some sort of half baked mulatto wop fantasist." "A girl with a really good face and a really good body and a useful tear or two can win over the men in suits any time." "But where do all these crazies come from, overruning...

Why, thank you, Champignon! My esteem can only rise in the eyes of the ET community with you attacking me! But, pray, how can you be sure that I am not really Joe Doaks, and that all the others are aliases? I fail to see how an additional alias is any less bogus than the first. And...

The attachment reiterates how bogus the alleged PV Relation (bottom study) is on a day when it should have worked well. Contrast that with the modest but not at all shabby performance of the two SCT-inspired systems above it. So can I pretty-PLEASE join the A-Team now? Or maybe create an A- team...

Now I understand, Mr_Black. But I can't code that because I'd have to get the past correct first, which is what I think I disproved. No disrespect to you, BTW, I like to read your posts in IR.

Thanks. Don't recall seeing it before. What do you call it?

I have often been asked why I flagellate myself systematically demolishing SCT, when almost everybody else here believes that SCT is utter foolishness and need no convincing. I keep at it because I invariably discover interesting market phenomena in the process of proving Jack wrong. Of course I...

Today's results totally validate Jack's gutsy take-no-prisoners policy of "no stops!" And point out the necessity to be wired for calm like Neoxx.

As long as everyone understands that this totally fraudulent code, being faithfully based on SCT, here's how it did today. I am not proud of it. But alternate codes that traded more did worse.

Just a teaser for Tara, before the system blows up. I'll make an SCT convert of her yet!

Good riddance to that Tara person. Now we can get back to the serious binness of unambiguously codifying SCT. Insiders may note that there was a peculiar PV pattern preceding bar 5 today (gotta love the compactness of that notation!). I'll post a solution for that condomundrum after the close...