Search results

LOL No

ET lol

For most it is. People can be very naïve about what it takes to become a consistently profitable trader.

" I bought a violin and took some lessons, when can I expect to play at Carnegie Hall?...any special techniques or tunings to speed the process?"

$3826.75 :sneaky:

:D

:D

DA's and AG's tend to shove white collar fraud cases to Civil jurisdiction. They take on criminal cases when it benefits them politically and/or the charges are egregious. Enron defined egregious corporate fraud.

:D

Bullshit, Skillern and Fastow didn't go to prison for "misleading investors". Fastow cooked the books by creating special purpose entities to hide losses. It was absolutely fraud. The separate entities were common in the energy industry but using them as a shell game was and is illegal.

Florida without Pitts and Toney were toothless...nothing Trask could do.

Other than Bama which seems fast tracked to a Natty, so many of the SEC horses are opting out so who knows.

:D

You are confusing fitness with neurotic obsession.

It's not something I do nor something I recommend but I know traders who do...and successfully. As in any robust trade plan, stop loss limits need to be strictly defined net of entries along with acceptable scale entry levels. The drawdowns on losing trade have to be weighed against trades saved...

Well stated

Don't run over any hatchling sea turtles with that thing.

Yeah but you're special Mickey :D

A simpleton like him couldn't be expected to understand the difference between scaling in within a defined, disciplined trade plan and "adding to losers".

And journals draw trolls like flies to road kill.