Search results

Newsbusters? Are you kidding? Is this another of your "major news outlets"? That deserves a threebie :D:D:D I've enjoyed your tapdance. Unfortunately, your credibility is still zero. And the above didn't help matters any.

No. Try to keep up. I know how hard it must be for you.

A dollar just doesn't buy what it used to.

I'm afraid Obama may have poisoned the well as far as electing negroes. Now Julian Castro is another matter.

It's election season. How much money did Reagan and the Bushes spend on these events? How much money did Nancy spend on clothes? Aren't you old enough to have ever been through an election before?

Then there are the idiots who support Repubs, and you're etc etc etc

Given that he beat up an Iraqi police officer and was fined and "allowed to retire", maybe not. Of course, there's McCain . . .

Imagined moral superiority? No. But I don't twist what I read so that it conforms to prejudices. You just don't think very well. But that's something you can learn how to do.

About as much as your response to my post.

You can't weasel out of it so easily. You used as a source a "news outlet" that arguably doesn't even qualify for the name, then you offer pure conjecture as fact FACT!!!, then instead of owning up to your error, you pursue this idiotic course in which you insist that you're right. Sorry, no...

Can you prove anyone has?

Clever. How 'bout that terrorist story?

And Paltrow's behavior was Obama's fault because . . .

Neither Salon nor HuffPost posted this "story". Perhaps their standards are a bit higher than "examiner.com". So have you been able to come up with any FACTS!!! regarding this story yet or not?

Now down to 3855.

I remember back when ET attracted people like Linda Bradford Raschke, Larry Connors, Vlad Graifer. And people wanted to see verified results. :rolleyes:

I wasn't commenting on the legality of anything. I was commenting on Ricter's post.

Do you? Interesting.

As I said, Salt Lake doesn't appear to be having this problem. It's certainly worth trying. Or one could just let them die.

Which is not the same thing as saying that "the Turkish government supports ISIS" or that "their PM is an avowed islamist who has turned Turkey from a secular state into another radical islamist troublemaker." If one begins with a paranoid conspiratorial mindset, then sure. But looking at...