Search results

Why does anything exist at all? People have wrestled with the mystery of why the universe exists for thousands of years. Pretty much every ancient culture came up with its own creation story - most of them leaving the matter in the hands of the gods - and philosophers have written reams on the...

Truthiness has replaced truth. Now that we all have our own facts, we may rue the day we personalized the news JANINE R. WEDEL . . . Think of this new world of media/Internet as a sort of privatization, or personalization. I don’t mean consolidation of the media—that it has become more...

Should you believe in a God? Not according to most academic philosophers. A comprehensive survey revealed that only about 14 percent of English speaking professional philosophers are theists.As for what little religious belief remains among their colleagues, most professional philosophers regard...

"We've had four months of propaganda, starting with the president, that everybody should hate the police." —former NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani

This is why I stopped debating these idiots. Once they get to the point where they run out of arguments, they either take off, change the subject, or launch personal attacks, which means that the entire debate was a waste of time. People like Max are simply defective and not worth the bother. I...

No, I don't have a number. But I've been doing this for twenty years. As to your other questions, finding answers, even if they're only tentative, is what testing is all about. The chief question is whether or not you can stop trading long enough to search for them.

Which is what the testing is all about.

If it's important to you to think so. Or it could be just a reluctance to waste time on an excrescence like you.

The interval is irrelevant. And retracements are off the table. Don't get ahead of yourself. If price drops below C, what are the probabilities that it will continue a downward move as opposed to recoiling and heading back to B?

All you have is what's in this segment. There is no "yesterday" or "lod". If a range had by now been established then one might consider a move to the first swing low in this segment, but there's no particular reason to do so. There is as yet no range (except for the narrow one up between "A"...

And what if anything can you do about this in order to ride what may or may not become a trending move?

True. We may achieve rapprochement with the Klingons, but then there are the Cardassians.

You're getting ahead of yourself again. None of this is available to you in real time. For the moment. Now, consider what you have to use once price has failed to exceed "B" (ignore everything after "B"): With regard to your first "ranging" rectangle, what can you look for to tell you...

It might. But at this point, there is no opposite extreme.

Don't concern yourself with numbers or making money or stops or shorts. Keep it simple. You have "A". "A" soon represents a high. This high becomes a swing high. Since it is the highest swing high during this period, it also represents an extreme. When price tests this extreme at "B" and can't...

Don't complicate it. And the bar interval is irrelevant. The "bar where it goes up, we don't know at the time if it can go higher or not". When do you know that it can't or won't or isn't? (And forget about closes and what's happening "in the bar". Keep it simple.)

Why bother with Fox News? The paranoid scenarios that are spun here are every bit as good.

Interesting that you start with 2009. What about 2007? Or 2003? 9/11? Then of course there's the Gulf War. And Joe McCarthy. And the League of Nations. Jeez.

There is a third choice: sideways. Which price has been known to do. Sometimes for days. As to the inability to take it higher, where does that take place?