Search results

Trader666 still doesn't understand what to 'ignore' someone means. He tries, we'll give him a bit of credit. But still failing pretty badly at it. :D

Looks like Trader666 couldn't stand the rain after he called down the thunder. :p So I guess this means that you have waived the white flag...you know....since you gave in and put me on 'iggy' after stamping your tiny feet about how you COULD put me on 'iggy' but don't. :cool: P.S...

Well, if not for good, at least a whole lot less! :) PS Nkhoi, be on the lookout for T28Matez

Look at Trader666, I have him flipping back and forth. He's scared of me for some reason (the 'iggy') yet cannot control himself from posting to me. :p Trader666, sit boy sit....good dog :cool: P.S The concept of 'ignore' is lost when you keep turning it off to respond! LOL :D

LOL, you're logic is terrible. If you have me on 'iggy' then you do not know one way or another if I did or did not send you a PM. You're claiming you 'know' when you, in fact, can't. :p By the way, the best ignore function is between your ears....or should be. :cool:

Don't you mean never keep 'YOU' out altogether? :confused: LOL :p

Where did Trader666's 'buddy' go? :confused: Could it be the new 'restrictions' have put an end to his silly game? :p

So far so good :)

Yes, it's sad that good deeds generally go unnoticed and bad deeds get headlines for months/years. But, then again, I'm sure the good deed doer's aren't in it for the headlines

2 years MINIMUM. That's what your expectation should be.

Series 7??? If anyone needs a prep course for that exam then I will guarantee that person will never make a dime trading. Just study diligently and you'll be fine. You need to know the facts but it's not a critical thinking test at all.

also heard hatchet wound :)

Well, then you don't 'get it' yet. You get some of 'it', but there is a lot of 'it' left to learn. Be humble, it sounds like this is a bit of a weak point for you based on the march 'rant'. :)

Then perhaps next time you should refrain from your 'March type' posts as that one was CLEARLY premature. :cool:

On page 1 of this thread (bottom post) he said he does 'get it'. If he 'gets it' he should at the very least go from 1 to 2 lots. If he finds out he does not have it then he can go back but it sounds like he needs to push the envelope a bit now.

I agree with the equilibrium part but do not agree it needs to equal the same amount of time spent losing. Learning should be more exponential and thus 2 yrs losing can be reversed in, say, 6 months of 'getting it'. When the lightbulb clicks there is no reason one must 'play it safe' for...

Well, this Weis fella is inconsistent in his evaluation of himself based on this thread right here and this thread (below): http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=194677

It's only 'not easy' if you let it be. If you have a proven track record through different market cycles and come out the other end with an avg such as Weis there is no reason not to bump up size. People always harp on the sizing up and how it's so hard in the ES but really that's people's...

You're wrong it IS easy because you are dealing with an instrument where scalability is not an issue. If you are averaging 1/2-1pt a day, you can average the very same metrics and make 10 times as much as you do now without adversely affecting the market one bit.

Wow, nice find. :)