Search results

you would need a handful of people with years of supplies , condoms and a strong leader in some hut in the back country in an area with good climate for agriculture to even remotely stand a chance...the Latter Day saints in utah have an advantage over the rest of us....but they'd need to borrow...

IF the SHTF in a big way..not gold , nor ammo , nor food is going to save anyone...unless you are planning on using the ammo to start capping people for food...backcountry and knowing how to survive in the back country and having the plan to get you there is the only thing that will save any of...

I bought a shark tales dvd from a kid who was hustling in the street and I got half a tale and no shark...at least the $5.00 probably bought him a nice binger...

Congrats, sounds like someone's been making money hand over fist.

RUN FOR THE HILLS..anytime the above happens to you.

now a 2 person company. :D

stop placing an "ORDER" for gay porn, ya fruit cake.

I am 40 and i feel like 20... :D

when their stock hit $50.00 in the month of NOV last year weren't people trading securities and derivatives as well? oh, yeah blah blah blah..

she wants insider trading to be legal...

Let's hope not everyone shares your view on this. Hopefully it doesn't mess you up when you grow up and have a change of view/outlook...peace

Some of those errors may go your way as well. But then the story wouldnt mention the mistake, it would mention how good the trader timed the market...peace

many platforms require you use a limit order to enter the trade. It is for the good of the client and has nothing to do with any legal issues. You can enter a market order if the platform allows it. Like another poster said the MM's would just double print you to shreds...peace

Carbon copy to what you just witnessed in the real estate market. Everyone and their mothers where flipping in and out of tech stocks. The stylists themselves where giving their clients hot stock picks...Stocks down 40 points just to be up 70 at the EOD...peace

:D Shudup-it-your'd-face

I think the action we saw early last year in the complete vaporization of any bid support for any company on any exchange was a glimpse of what too big to fail means...Could this have been orchastrated? We may very well have witnessed the biggest ransom ever..

exactly and since many lenders didn't lend out responsibly, they should have had their houses taken away, not bailed out. And certainly not have politicians choose which house can be kept.I'm not here to argue with you. It really is everyones fault... :D

you know who you are, just look in the mirror.

Bad Lenders = bad mortgages.... It is ultimately the financial responsibility of the lender to lend to someone who might just pay them back, that's how the business works. Unless of course....too much for me to write, but just go down memory lane for the last 5 years...you see; hindsight is...

exactly, most of them have it backwards. You don't downsize when you have hit the bottom, You downsize to try and avoid the bottom. I understand though that times are very tough out there.