Search results

But it's 4 atom bombs per second. That's a lot. The Nazis tried to make an atom bomb. Thus, AGW is like the spread of Nazism in WW2. It must be stopped and requires similar levels of determination. The fight against global warming will be a huge and long lasting war.

A couple of physicists did it to help people get some concept of how much energy is being gained. Saying that it's so and so joules means nothing to most people.

Well it was just a couple of physicists that crunched the numbers. It's a way to gain some appreciation of the amount of energy being gained. We could also say that it 's 1.2 x 10 to the 22nd power Joules per year, but no one can conceive such a thing.

Yeah. It could come back down as rain in the Rockies.

This much plus about 11% more for the land and air. But CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas. It is estimated that the increased heat gained from the increased GHGs is equal to about 4 Hiroshima bombs per second exploding in the atmosphere. Perhaps 3 of the 4 is due to CO2.

Most is lost to evaporation and transpiration. The latter is the "sweating" of the trees through it's leaves and is what acts as the pump for the tree's plumbing.

So you want to blame me for your stupidity. Just like the douchebag you are.

I was certainly trying to make a point right from the start. No surprise it went right over the heads of the moron righties here. The idiocy is clearly yours.

Are you going to deny that he said these words you lying troll? "Do you remember when America was good? Do you remember when we had jobs and we were building towards a brighter future, and things were really happening? Clinton administration, we had it under control. "

"What difference does it make?" Right wing nitwits do it all the time. Are you saying doing so is OK when righty morons do it but not when progressives do it?

OH! So context matters? And excerpts from a larger statement can lead to erroneous conclusions? I mean.....What difference does it make? So glad to see to the nitwit righties finally understand this. Or not.

He certainly said these words..."Do you remember when America was good? Do you remember when we had jobs and we were building towards a brighter future, and things were really happening? Clinton administration, we had it under control. Things were good,..."

He certainly said these words..."Do you remember when America was good? Do you remember when we had jobs and we were building towards a brighter future, and things were really happening? Clinton administration, we had it under control. Things were good,..."

Glen Beck was quoted as saying the following... "Do you remember when America was good? Do you remember when we had jobs and we were building towards a brighter future, and things were really happening? Clinton administration, we had it under control. Things were good, and they weren't great...

"Clinton pointed at the top category and said the economy required a 'toppling' of the wealthiest 1 percent, according to several people," writes The Times' Amy Chozick. The anecdote was included in Chozick's report on the Clinton campaign's broader message that argues that the candidate has...

But by virtue of Hillary's age, she doesn't need to be as beholden to the money powers. This is her last hurrah. She doesn't have to worry about a long political life ahead of her and the attendant necessary groveling to the moneyed powers. She should be able to loosen the strings.

And we should give your opinion equal weight to these guys? American Physical Society "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human...

Pathological confirmation bias. I like that..... almost?

Yup. I'm afraid that the oldest growth forests are in for a tough time. http://www.automation-drive.com/EX/05-15-06/global_warming_temperature_trends_projections.jpg