Search results

Preaching? WTF are you doing in here moron? No disagreement on substance I see, once again you cannot compete on ideas my fiscal idealogy has been on the 'sidelines' for many years now, the last time anyone who thought like me had power was 1995-2000. No problem for me personally, I'm...

Here's what you fools do not get, the economy is already ruined. Keeping up this fiscal life support system based on stimulus by borrowing money for entitlements will not work, even Obama has said so. I personally don't care if you idiots don't like that message, it is the only responsible...

while the democrats like Obama take in the communist whackos like OWS since they are 'big tent' and all you are a delusional talk-out-of-your-ass democrat. Tea party is mainly about fiscal conservatism, and that will never sell amongst government addicted minorities. Blacks cannot survive...

I would be too embarrassed to take it to the news

What have our military actions gained us in the last 25 years? I say screw Taiwan and south korea as well, let's make our own computers. On the other hand I do not want our military eviscerated, that would invite a lot of pain down the road. Term 2 is going to be liberals gone wild, look...

no it's not been any part of the discussion so far, you just got desperate because the data shows you are full of crap. private sector unions have nothing to do with gov't socialism, in fact it hurts your argument for 2 reasons. 1. the union movement started long before 1946 and 2. the great...

bullshit, we were talking about government led socialism private unions are another matter, and unions do not cause prosperity, they result from it, and they pertain to people who are actually working slimy lefty goal post shifting

no contradictions here as I am not a religious righty, not in your way I'm not sure what is more annoying with you, your stupidity or your dishonesty

nice try at changing the subject, your claim is refuted. you are one intellectually dishonest SOB

Sweden and Canada: social spending boomed from 1970 -1990, destroyed their economies. Then along came conservative reform and viola- things are better. How anybody who recieves oxygen to their brain can believe that socialism is the path to prosperity is a real mystery. The only explaination...

we had very little social spending in 1950, very small compared to today, so no we didn't move to socialism in a big way until the 60s. we boomed because of free market capitalism, socialism wasn't big enough to have an impact since it moved from about 2% GDP to 3.3% GDP in 1947-50. There was...

no, pointing out that you guys need to look in the mirror

should we review the ignorance of the average obama voter?

lefties love symbolism and labels freethinker isn't a critical or free thinker, he just has a point of view and he is too indoctrinated to know better 'progressives' are regressive towards tyrrany communists love larger than life slogans and names like "shining path," "forward," 'Hope...

Towards which 'pole' does a modern nation move towards when they want prosperity or when they have to fix government debt?

....and the new disability boom as I mentioned in another thread, 6% of the workforce now collecting checks at a cost that would finance another major war or two and is artifically holding down the unemployment rate (thereby helping the barbarians to power). The idea of working itself is one...

everyone has something, the question is how much

I'm talking about this you ignoramus http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/21/us-crisis-timeline-idUSTRE7AK0FF20111121

I posted this earlier, it will be very interesting. American liberals with no republicans in their way. Let's watch the circus.

are you for the transaction tax?