Search results

Soviet? hmmm. very skeptical

data be damned, I'm getting older and I'm tired of waiting That shape looks zeta reticuli-like

1. You can't have it both ways. Either Republican policy is responsible for 97-2000 or Clinton's policies are not responsible for anything. Republican growth rates are higher, period, depsite what you orinially claimed, and to say that the republican revolution had no impact on 95-97 is...

No, I want this to be extraterrestrial, explaination dismissed.

1. Right, but that actually makes your argument worse. average GDP growth rate 97-00 is 4.45% 2. If you knew anything about economics, you would know that you cannot with certainity isolate the efects of any single policy like you are pretending. 3. It certainly is in dispute, the GDP...

1. you are wrong on the data Average GDP growth rate 93-94 3.5% Average GDP growth rate 95-00 4.0% http://www.statista.com/statistics/188165/annual-gdp-growth-of-the-united-states-since-1990/ 2. You said the 97 cuts reduced revenue, they did nothing of the sort, revenue went up...

' and the economy was on the upswing as Clinton came in, was Bush given credit just as BushII is given blame? the growth rates were higher after post republican revolution, one would normally expect lower growth rates as the expansion matured

was this one ever identified? I never found an answer. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Als788qHYuY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

you forgot to add they cut cap gains from 28% to 20%, then you forgot to add how the economy boomed after that

what exactly is progressive about ideas more than 100 years old?

actually it's been around for a while As an american I'm annoyed that Europeans can't fight small wars even in their backyard. For and Libya and Kosovo euros said they needed help.

you are not reading me correctly. I'm saying I never claimed to be here to defend science, unlike FT. I'm not here to take up that mantle. What I do hold up as my own values is to carefully observe the world before forming opinion, and then holding the option of changing my mind. Very unlike...

Obama and Holder are going to 'make sure' that blacks pass exams in their 'entitled' numbers. I ask, then why bother even taking the exam? what's the point of competing if you already know the result? UM is going to love that

Other than calling out freethinker here, have I ever made a claim that I was doing it for the sake of advancing science? If I have, then I retract that. OK, so now let's couple that with the observational reality around us. Start with some observational facts that I hope you agree are a...

I can tell you. It is because places like UM value their reputation for excellence. AA is at odds with excellence, so they have wisely chosen the latter as the best ideal since it produces the best outcomes for society and themselves. There are plenty of lower tier schools for blacks to...

the cause is real education, and not polarizing the public people out to 'save' americans from themselves are called dictators, people who think they know what is best for everyone else are called delusional control freaks. Truly free people need no such saving, unfortunately liberty is dying...

if there is no cause, then why does he have 'a responsibility' the cause is simply to educate, not indoctrinate, science is apolitical What the left has done is hijack science and claim it supports a left political agenda. The pollution of science with hidden political agendas is the...

jeez, too much to ask you to read the post? he says he has 'a responsibility' here's the thing, he doesn't really 'speak' deeply or originally, he just cuts pastes, insults, and parrots. He is fighting a war that was over about 200 years ago and ignores the current real threats to science...

awww that's why you here, you gonna save the world ....then you need to shut up, as a trained scientist I'm telling you that you are hurting the cause

count yourself among them trades 'in the face of ideology'? LOL, now that's stupid