Search results

As always ,waiting on our handicapped AA friend (that would be you by the way).

Funny ain't it? :D

I have a functioning journal dumbass. I'll start a new one next year. Why do I need a separate one upstairs all for you, while I've already got one down here for honest exchange of opinions? What other excuses you gonna make next mr palestinian?

or we can become like in italy where everybody is a tax criminal.

I think he represents about 15-20% of the population.

rcg the biggest clown on ET. Unintentional humor is the best.

I've had a journal upstairs (where you peevishly say it belongs since march), so there's nothing stopping you from creating your own .

bump , As you requested rcg 11/29/12

I think "fair" for those clamoring about "fair share" would be somewhere around 94% of their income or wealth whichever is greater.

oops there went your line of attack. So you asked a stupid question and I caught you and now you're mad at me ? :D :D

Then one must assume your world is about the size of a marble.

It's a simple question : answer it. (don't try to pawn it off on jem) Do you believe there is internal validity to your question : yes or no?

I think punystrike needs to address my question first , and acknowledge the assumptions of his question. Of course he's checkmated either way, so I doubt he'll answer.

Pretty powerful: But I think of them as the greedy old fart union.

Funny how rcg pretends I broke protocol by making it MORE convenient to post in a journal. :D :D

I guess I'm a little fuzzy on what all the issues the fiscal cliff are supposed to encompass. I don't consider it a cliff as much as an economic tar pit.

I'm asking you, if you think your question has internal validity, if not why bothering to answer it : but I guess you're too stupid to realize that.

Seriously what cliff and why should I as a conservative care? or are they simply talking about taxmageddon?

Are you claiming it does?

:D :D