Search results

Nobody is holding you here. If you stay, it's your choice.

I wouldn't call it a shakeout unless there's a float. More likely it's just a test of selling interest. Since buyers stepped in, that was that, tho there's no guarantee it won't be tried again.

Because those who are not stupid benefit from the explanations and clarifications. At some point, though, all the explanations and clarifications have been made and there's no point in continuing.

Again? Promise?

Not another thread about kp, please. There are so many already.

A reminder that trading is going on -- or will be in five minutes -- at TL.

Eagerness to trade supplants deliberation

Which doesn't answer the question regarding insurance. Have a lovely evening.

And the answer to that question was "yes". We've moved on from that. As to the chart, I look forward to seeing it.

Why else buy the insurance? Is insult your default position?

The subject of the thread is my "teachings", i.e., Wyckoff and the SLA/AMT that I wrote. It is not about AMT in general. If you want to believe that AMT does not explain every movement of price in the market, you are entitled to that belief. But your beliefs are not pertinent to the thread. As...

No, but you're betting that it will. Otherwise the money is wasted. As to Gringo being stupid, no. Sorry. You'll have to pick on somebody else for that.

If you want to address AMT as discussed in the pdf, I'll be happy to do so as that is the subject of this thread. If you want to discuss the theory and application of AMT in general elsewhere, that is another matter. As to your rape analogy, it has nothing to do with AMT. Prostitution, yes...

What exactly is it about the SLA/AMT pdf that you disagree with?

I'm not trying to be pedantic, just to maintain ties to reality. I don't see what rape has to do with any of this. As for defending AMT, I do so because it's being attacked here. Why I'm not entirely sure. But AMT does explain every movement of price if the price represents an agreement...

Given that a trade represents an agreement between a buyer and a seller and each is free to enter into the trade or not, AMT does in fact "explain" any and all price movement. Sellers cannot move price without willing buyers. Buyers cannot move price without willing sellers. What is "fair" is...

Jack and I never got along particularly well way back when, and we still disagree on what I consider to be important issues. But I hope that those of you who have benefited from Jack's guidance will make every effort to contact him and tell him how much you appreciate his help while you still...

If your post is in reference to the ES, you're correct. The short-term movements have little to do with fair value per se because of all that goes on in the ES/SPX. This is not the case with the NQ, which is why I trade that instead. However, over the longer-term, the ES is just as subject to...

:rolleyes:

;)