Search results

Anti-media critiques are often absurdly one-sided. Their anti-media world is one where you whine about perceived slights to your side and conveniently ignore bad press that Democrats get. Anything that doesn't embrace the right-wing line is, by definition, biased. As Noonan puts it: "we all...

National Review? LOL The magazine has been described as "the bible of American conservatism". So you pick a biased source to show a supposed bias? LOL This is what the Huffington Post says about them " A bunch of right wing nut jobs."

ON IGNORE !!!!!!

Seen it. He is not a climate scientist, he is a righty, he is a businessman and he is wrong and misrepresents the science at almost every turn. This is the Weather Channel's statement which basically agrees with every other science organization in the world, not a single science org disagrees...

Ironically, the dirty Chinese coal plants may be adding enough aerosols to reduce incoming solar and air temp rise. Of course the earth's heat content, most of which is in the oceans, as whole has not paused in it's uptrend at all.

Since 1990, global surface temperatures have warmed at a rate of about 0.15°C per decade, within the range of model projections of about 0.10 to 0.35°C per decade. As the IPCC notes, "global climate models generally simulate global temperatures that compare well with observations over climate...

We can hope for some volcano action but that would just be a temporary reprieve.

One can see how the S.O. spiked temps in 98 and has been quiet since. If solar and SO happen to coincide in the next cycle look out, new high temp records.

In addition to the 97% + consensus among climate scientists..... List of scientific organizations that support the consensus The following scientific organizations support the view that human activities have contributed to observed climate change:[8] Academia Chilena de Ciencias, Chile...

Did you say something jerm? Just came across this interesting info. This set of graphs shows the estimated contribution of various natural and human factors to changes in global mean temperature between 1889–2006.[41] Estimated contributions are based on multivariate analysis rather than...

Multiple lines of evidence support attribution of recent climate change to human activities:[4] A basic physical understanding of the climate system: greenhouse gas concentrations have increased and their warming properties are well-established.[4] Historical estimates of past climate changes...

Oh Jem, Over here!!!! Click on "more". The science!!!!!! Here it is!!!!! All one needs to know.!!!!!Look here!!! See?????!!!!Put on your glasses!!!! You lying sack of shit

No you are trying to say that man's burning of fossil fuels did not cause the 40% rise in CO2 and corresponding temp increase. Which is fucking stupid. You also seem to think some mysterious thing caused temps to rise which then caused the increase in CO2. Which is also fucking stupid. In...

YOU have been discredited you lying sack of shit.

In the scientific field of climate studies – which is informed by many different disciplines – the consensus is demonstrated by the number of scientists who have stopped arguing about what is causing climate change – and that’s nearly all of them. A survey of 928 peer-reviewed abstracts on the...

Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities, and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/