Search results

No practical difference in the humiliation we've suffered due to our leaders, elected and otherwise. We vote, they vote. We get what we want and deserve as do they.

If it's true that answering this correctly can help one land an interview for a salaried position at a large company, we're in worse trouble than I thought. It shouldn't take any extraordinary insight to see that during the final effort the sheep reaches the top and thus doesn't fall back.

If you were to take the time to understand the process, you'd know that it entails studying old charts in order to form hypotheses to be tested both backwards and forwards eventually working toward simtrading and real-time trading. Some people pick it up quickly; some not so quickly. Since he is...

Because people are a lot smarter than the right wing thinks they are. Brownback will likely be finding that out eventually.

That wasn't the question. You asked, "Are there oligarchs in these functional equivalents that you speak of?" I assume he'll bring up the 50s. But maybe not.

Remember you're dealing with youngsters here, Ricter.;)

Maybe this cycle people will finally figure out just how full of shit the right wing is. But probably not.

I guess they'll be moving to Idaho now. Where shall we send the pork and beans?

I suppose we can guess just how tight your grasp is of the law . . .

Oh?

Key word being "essentially", i.e., not the same. Don't try that slick lawyerly folderol on me, sonny.

Going wildly off-topic, and if it matters, this version is 40+ years old: A snail is at the bottom of a well 30 feet deep. It can crawl upward 3 feet in one day, but at night it slips back two feet. How long does it take the snail to crawl out of the well?

Yeah. If it weren't for the government, we'd have full employment and everyone would be making enough money to live the good life. Shorter workweeks, more benefits, everybody happy.

You asked a new question. You did not, as you said, "repeat" the question. Lazy thinking, as usual. Or no thinking. Whatever.

Actually you are, at least online. But zip down here. The silence is indicative.

Interesting the way he changes the question after being caught in posting something stupid. It's a habit.

Pretty much. I can't provide a video of our burning any ISIS members alive, and there are no real-time films of inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasake being incinerated while alive, but there are plenty of films of the aftermath. I'm sure the films of radioactive burns would be most satisfactory...

With all due respect, I must disagree. Beginners as a group have little to no idea how to develop a bias that is reasonably accurate. Which is why they so often trade the wrong side (one need only review the journals, particularly the "real-time" journals, to see this). This does not mean that...