Search results

Good thing the data was adjusted. It made it more accurate. Why dumb-ass deniers can't understand this is a mystery.

Why? Climate change better describes it. It is far more than simply a little warming and man is the local god. The other one is on vacation or left the building entirely.

Oh, and they directly putting almost a billion dollars toward influencing the next prez election. Yet Piezoe does not know about them.

Seriously? They were pretty much are the creators of the new Libertarianism. You know, the kind for corporations. The kind that says safety and enviro regulations are bad, and science should be denied when it hurts profits. I mean, the way you deny AGW, they would like you very much and...

Well it appears that as usual, you are laughably deluded and wrong.

Like a Koch bros Libertarian?

Because, believe it or not, progressives actually think Jesus was a cool dude and he said many good things like help the poor and sick, turn the other cheek etc. These are progressive ideals. Jesus never said gay marriage should not happen nor did he say anything about contraception that I...

So jem doesn't like Francis because Francis is too Christlike and not beholden to the layers of complete bullshit the CC has built up around the teachings of Jesus. Dogma over Jesus. Ideology over Science. No big surprise there.

“The Holy Father is being misled by ‘experts’ at the United Nations who have proven unworthy of his trust,” Joseph Bast, the president of the Heartland Institute, said in a statement. “Though Pope Francis’ heart is surely in the right place, he would do his flock and the world a disservice by...

So jem, what do you think about this?

WASHINGTON — Since his first homily in 2013, Pope Francis has preached about the need to protect the earth and all of creation as part of a broad message on the environment. It has caused little controversy so far. But now, as Francis prepares to deliver what is likely to be a highly...

Anything from a real source jerm?

http://www.automation-drive.com/EX/05-15-06/global_warming_temperature_trends_projections.jpg

https://www.google.com/search?q=carbon+emissions+co2+temperature+graph&es_sm=93&biw=1920&bih=947&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=RXTfVIfqMuS1sASolIH4Cw&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ#imgrc=aZLY6wmAatDTKM%253A%3BJqK4AcY2FM1NWM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwhyfiles.org%252F211warm_arctic%252Fimages%252F1000yr_change.jpg%3Bh...

https://www.skepticalscience.com/climate-models.htm

Yes, have you? Probably not since you don't even know if it's warming or not.

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/co2-temperature.html

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Anything from a reliable, real source of news? You must be kidding. The Telegraph? LOL You are an idiot sheep.

No the predictions of air temps did not fail miserably, they did not fail at all. Of course the ocean heat content can be determine with reasonable accuracy. Certainly enough to say they gaining almost the heat equivalent of 4 atom bombs per second due to AGW. No the evidence is mounting that...