Search results

But there was no pause in the heating of the earth. At all. In fact the rate of heat gain went up during that period. You still seem confused about this basic issue. When you are wrong on this basic issue there is little reason to listen to anything else you say.

So jem must be one of those cafeteria Catholics.

Hey jerm. Did you ever find a quote from a publishing climatologist denying man made global warming? Come on, there must be at least one if, like you say, only 0.03% believe in AGW. Come on jerm. ONE statement expressly denying AGW. If you cannot find one author denying it we must assume...

So then you think these organizations are bullshitting? Wow, you must be smarter than they are. American Chemical Society "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from...

........ She decided to do something no climate scientist had thought to do: count the published scientific papers. Pulling 928 of them, she was startled to find that not one dissented from the basic findings that warming was underway and human activity was the main reason. She published that...

Newsflash genius, THE US IS NOT THE WORLD.

Well of course this how someone who was caught having two forum names would respond. The similarity in style and depth of bullshit from both you is just too similar to be coincidence.

But the Koch bros just want to have liberty. They only want what is best for the future on mankind.

Not positive but it would explain his piles of bullshit posts which are like the gold standard of denier propaganda and demonstrate a professional level of disinformation and pseudo-science. Otherwise his posts make no sense. They are such obvious bullshit

No, I'm just wondering why you have two forum names. There is no doubt that you and piezoe are the same person. This is a tactic used by organizations like the Cato Institute. There is no question that they have people using social media and forums like this to spread their disinformation and...

piezoe, why do you have two forum names?

Makes sense, buoys are more accurate than buckets of water pulled aboard a ship, but this will just get the deniers even more hysterical. It may even make some that are on fence about the issue say WTF? However, this is actually a good example of how science improves with time.

I would hope so. Otherwise they are not as accurate. Why you cannot understand this is a mystery.

Let's start with your first sentence. Perhaps if it's true we can delve further into the festering pile of bullshit. "I think the basic problem with climate science is in the assumption that climate is stable.... " Well, you make it so easy to simply ignore the rest of the shit you write...

Yes, I think there should be an international agreement to reduce CO2 pollution. If that's what you mean. You know, we have many international agreements already. Did you ever look up the thing about the erupting volcano with the CO2 measuring thing on top? Do you need me to do a Google...

Maybe in your delusional mind, such as it is, but no, it is you however who have amply demonstrated that you are a complete idiot. And now talking about AGW makes one a traitor? LOL Take your meds.

There is this thing called Google. Try it moron.

You've got to be fucking kidding me. Now you think that all the measurements of CO2 around the world are merely subjective assumptions? What the hell is it with this place? Why are there so many complete morons?