Search results

A recent Yale survey concluded that “Americans’ certainty that the earth is warming has increased over the past three years,” and “those who think global warming is not happening have become substantially less sure of their position.” Falsification and denial, while still all too extensive...

Carbon dioxide is the lifeblood of civilization as we know it. It is also the direct cause fueling an impending climate disaster. There is no viable alternative to counteract global warming except through direct human effort to reduce the atmospheric CO2 level. Actually I agree...

Jem you ignorant slut. There is no ice age starting. The current CO2 rise is raisiing temps. All the world's scientists know this. Too bad that you don't.

Since humans are responsible for changing the level of atmospheric carbon dioxide, they then also have control over the global temperature of the Earth. Humans are at a difficult crossroad. Carbon dioxide is the lifeblood of civilization as we know it. It is also the direct cause fueling an...

I'm happy for you that you believe in God.

From the foregoing, it is clear that CO2 is the key atmospheric gas that exerts principal control (80% of the non-condensing GHG forcing) over the strength of the terrestrial greenhouse effect. Water vapor and clouds are fast-acting feedback effects, and as such, they are controlled by the...

"There is to date no evidence, by direct measurement, showing any measurable increase in the Earth's temperature due to this small number of additional CO2 molecules relative to the total number. A prudent and scientifically minded person would not expect there to be. The Earth's surface...

Evaluating a 1981 temperature projection - GHG theory - from Hansen et al. Global warming was not yet an issue at the KNMI where the focus was much more on climate variability, which explains why the article of Hansen et al. was unnoticed at that time by the second author. It turns out to be a...

No he's simply wrong. And he does not avoid absurdity by using the adjective "significant". An increase by 40% over two hundred years is certainly significant. One can look at this chart and see the significance. And GHG theory, which you refer to as the "Hansen Hypothesis", so you can...

Stu, thanks for helping me out here with your response to him about this Woodcock thing. I'm curious what you think is pie's deal. It just doesn't make sense. He is obviously intelligent and is liberal/progressive on all other topics and I generally agree with what he writes in those areas...

This is what will cause the extinction at the end of the Anthropocene.

No jem CO2 leads temps. Only an idiot would deny that. So you do.

You have no science showing temps lead CO2. Still waiting for it. Haven't seen it yet. On the other hand we all know CO2 is a greenhouse gas which by very definition leads temps higher. Get back to us when you have science showing otherwise. Lysenkoist.

CO2 certainly does lead temps. Actually there is very little lead time. The effect of rising CO2 is almost immediate. Rising CO2 causes essentially concurrent rise in earth temps. This is basic climate science 101.

This is what happens when the most important greenhouse gas is increased 40% by man's emissions.

So jem, is CO2 a greenhouse gas?

Nixon created the EPA.

The statement and article is true. The other thing is that Republican's are simply stupid. Scientists are not.