Search results

Destruction of Ecosystems Changing climatic conditions and dramatic increases in carbon dioxide will put our ecosystems to the test, threatening supplies of fresh water, clean air, fuel and energy resources, food, medicine and other matters we depend upon not just for our lifestyles but for our...

Actually it's now closer to 40% more acidic.

Jerm, you are by far the most intellectually dishonest depraved ideologue I have ever met. Climategate is obviously a big nothing and the hockey stick is without a doubt correct. Stop being such a douchebag.

Fox News, in its coverage of the U.N. climate summit, provided the perfect example of this: While the Climate Summit has undoubtedly raised the profile of the U.N.’s green agenda, skeptics continue to question the effort to cut carbon emissions, particularly its impact on global economic...

Jerm, you are by far the most intellectually dishonest depraved ideologue I have ever met. Climategate is big nothing and the hockey stick is correct. Stop being such a douchebag.

jem, just do the earth a favor and kill yourself now. It's science deniers like you that are one of the biggest threats to the earth. The earth yearns for your death. It is the only thing that will shut your lying douchebag mouth.

jerm is the real douchebag here. A lying intellectually dishonest douchebag. ******************************** the question is not whether acidification is happening, but how bad it will get -- which depends on future CO2 emissions. "Today, the atmospheric CO2 concentration is about 388...

The ocean are now something like 40% more acidic than two hundred years ago because they are absorbing much of our CO2.

Is there no lie that you will not repeat jerm? You are by far the most intellectually dishonest cretin I have ever met. The problem with the explanation for the dumb science deniers is that it uses too many words and requires some thought. So they stay with the simple one line quote. Duh...

No trick. Nothing wrong was done. You are an idiot.

CO2 is costing us because it causes global warming and acidification of the oceans

Because that vapor is costing and will cost us. The true cost is currently not in the equation. Once it is the free market will find the solution.

I did not read past the second sentence. No point. When you are so obviously wrong so soon there's no point. Actually I even gave you the first one which was also wrong.

Sea levels suddenly rapidly rising along with temperature at start of ind revolution.

Sea levels are rising at increasing rate.

What the fuck are you talking about "govt controlling all the energy"? and "govt allowance"?. Until now I have given you the benefit of the doubt. No more. You are now under the column "probable moron". How is a slowly ramping carbon tax "the govt controlling all the energy"?

Perhaps you could post "Hansen's Hypothesis" in his own words, so we can judge for ourselves what he is saying. Why should we trust what YOU say it is, especially considering how much complete bullshit you shoveled our way in your last twenty posts. As it is, I believe you are leaving out some...

All the sea ice talk aside, it is quite clear that really when it comes to Antarctic ice and sea levels, sea ice is not the most important thing to measure. In Antarctica, the largest and most important ice mass is the land ice of the West Antarctic and East Antarctic ice sheets. Therefore, how...

I don't make threats. I very politely ask of you just one simple thing. Kill yourself, now. LOL

If one looks at this time series one can how much more the Arctic has warmed. This has to cause some changes in weather. Especially considering that weather systems and ocean currents depend on the difference between high and low latitude temps. The temp differences are decreasing...