Can you read? I said I DO remember the article from the one scientist that got the deniers so excited. So what? It's true that any one weather event cannot be said with assurance that it is due to GW. The other indisputable fact is that EVERY weather event is being effected by GW. Both of...
But it was not fine tuned because there is no fine tuner. "Appearing" fine tuned does not mean it "is" fine tuned nor do the scientists say that in way shape or form.
Who are you trying to kid jem? Just like with AGW, you are being dishonest.
Oh wait, the article where one scientist said that that some extreme weather events could not be firmly connected to global warming? So what? In one respect he is right.
OTOH, and more importantly and accurate is that nearly ALL climatologists/meteorologists say that EVERY weather event is...
What the hell are you babbling about? What article from NASA? The one that jerm misrepresented about CO2 acting as a coolant in the stratosphere? All I ever see from you denier nitwits like you is bullshit from Breitbarf or LOLWUWT or stuff from that fraudulent fool Salby.
The fact is that...
What catastrophic predictions? What you think were predictions were not predictions by the climate science community as a whole but were guesses by individual scientists. Not the same thing. By 1980 the climate science community predicted global warming. They were right.
The data was...
Oh yeah, when normal, intelligent, decent people see the levels of bigotry, racism, hatred and just plain hysterical stupidity of the righties here they are naturally offended. Speaks well about you.
Ha ha ha. Breitbarf. Jerm, you show your true colors. Deranged. Why did you even post this shit?
Oh wait, I get it, he's an atheist. Those fucking atheists.
You're a moron.