Search results

American Association for the Advancement of Science "The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3 American Chemical Society "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and...

Since the beginning of human civilization, our atmosphere contained about 275 ppm of carbon dioxide. That is the planet “on which civilization developed and to which life on earth is adapted.” Beginning in the 18th century, humans began to burn coal, gas, and oil to produce energy and goods. The...

Yup. CO2 is the greenhouse gas that largely controls the temperature of the planet and we have raised it's level by 40% so we are seeing the temps rapidly rise. I'm pretty sure that is what you are getting at with this post. Good job.

And you still don't get. Even if we accept that there is a pause in new yearly highs after the strong El Nino year of 98, the fact that the models did not predict that in no way makes the models invalid or wrong or climate science "incompetent" (whatever that means). They were not expected to...

No, all the models and temp data agree. ALL of them. Temps will be and are going up. Pretty fast. 100%. Just like the consensus among publishing climatologists.

And again, you don't care that this is a lie. Again with the bogus data sets. Where are the other temp data sets?

And the inevitable ad hom attack. The last resort for someone losing a debate. Next you will mention Al Gore. Look, it's simple. You are trying to say that if the climate models don't predict every small deviation around the trend line that they cannot be trusted. This shows an ignorance...

Yes, I'm sure it was carefully done. Of that I'm certain. The denial propaganda machine is pretty clever. No publishing climatologist - other than the Russian threatened with Siberia - denies man made global warming. If they did it should be an easy matter to just quote them. Why they would...

And none of them are publishing climatologists and if they are they have never expressly said that AGW is false. Never. But to be accurate, there is one Russian that under penalty of banishment to Siberia has said that Russian oil burning does not lead to global warming. So yeah I was wrong...

Yes. Thank you for confirming that you are a COMPLETE fucking idiot.

Yes the entire world's science community is perpetrating a hoax. http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ You must be the biggest, most ignorant asshole on ET. And that is saying something.

You did not understand anything I said did you? You have no interest in the facts do you? The raw data is not as accurate as the adjusted data. Even Judith Curry admits that. You are just too stupid to understand why it was it done.

I know more about the science than you have even dreamed about knowing. Do you have a degree in environmental science? No? Well I do. There is no pause. Some folks may have erroneously referred to it as that but the new data shows that there was no pause at all in the atmospheric temp rise...

Oh my fucking god, how many times to I have to tell you denier idiots that this chart is a lie. The temp data set is AN EXTREMELY selective, mid troposphere mid latitude satellite and balloon data set. IN OTHER WORDS NOT WORLD TEMPS!!!!!!! Where is the data from actual ground based weather...

Looks like the world's air temps are still increasing. No real change in trend here. http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/features/201501_gistemp/

Temps are well within model predictions.

No, the predictions were NOT shown to be false by the next 14 years. Not at all. What IS shown by your saying that is that you are indeed deluded. How's the grass over there on the right? Where do YOU get your climate science? Fox News? WSJ ? Forbes ? lol I'm not even going any...

You mean make more accurate ? Why do denier nitwits think accuracy is a bad thing?

What a heel.

So you get your climate science from Fox News, the WSJ and Breitbart while rejecting NASA and NOAA. And you expect to be taken seriously. Is that about RIGHT?