Search results

The Washington Post’s Matea Gold recently interviewed Charles Koch. When she asked if he was worried about climate change, Koch replied, Well, I mean I believe it’s been warming some. There’s a big debate on that, because it depends on whether you use satellite measurements, balloon, or you use...

http://ete.cet.edu/gcc/style/images/uploads/historical03.gif

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

See, I told you Obama was a great president. Article doesn't mention coal once. IBD, what a surprise.

Of course you saw nothing. More like nothing registered in that warped brain of yours. You are a joke.

So you didn't read the article. Whatever. The ignorant just want to stay that way I guess.

From the idiot wetodddidtoo's post above............... "The recent cold winters and expanding polar ice caps are ominous signs of a global cooling that has already begun, maintains David Dilley -" lol, what an idiot, and this is the kind of douchebag that right wing denier morons like...

So? He's wrong about almost all the above and he whore for the FF industry/conservative think tanks and is not a climatologist. Is this what you consider good science? LOL

Oh wow, the famous and respected mcclatchdc.com. lol You righties are embarrassing

A natural change of 100ppm normally takes 5,000 to 20.000 years. The recent increase of 100ppm has taken just 120 years. Additional confirmation that rising CO2 levels are due to human activity comes from examining the ratio of carbon isotopes (eg ? carbon atoms with differing numbers of...

Let me amend that, nearly all, essentially all, 99% of the CO2 increase in the last two hundred years is due to man. Is what the current science says.

To claim that the CO2 lag disproves the warming effect of CO2 displays a lack of understanding of the processes that drive Milankovitch cycles. A review of the peer reviewed research into past periods of deglaciation tells us several things Deglaciation is not initiated by CO2 but by orbital...

No, the entire increase in CO2 is from man. All of it. CO2 levels largely control the temperature of the temp of the earth. This is basic climate science. You really should do some research first before spouting volumes of vacuous bullshit. You seem to be guessing without much true...

Oh I get it. You have just been pretending to be a moron and actually you knew all along that it's due to CO2 increase due to man.

No stupid, it's not the sun. http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-whats-warming-the-world/ This conclusion is confirmed by many studies finding that while the sun contributed to warming in the early 20th Century, it has had little contribution (most likely negative) in the last few...

There are, however, many climate scientists, which include meteorologists and atmospheric physicists, that are Hansen Hypothesis deniers. Their view is that while our Earth may indeed be warming, the evidence is overwhelming that the warming has nothing to do with CO2...

lol at ignorant righties Awards Received The Guardian has been awarded the National Newspaper of the Year in 1999, 2006,[160] 2011[161] and 2014[13] by the British Press Awards, and "Front Page of the Year" in 2002 ("A declaration of war", 12 September 2001).[160][162] It was also co-winner of...

You find great newspapers funny? Typical moron righty.

“We have two political parties, neither one of which is willing to face reality,” said Hansen, who now heads up the Climate Science, Awareness and Solutions Program at Columbia University. “Conservatives pretend it’s all a hoax, and liberals propose solutions that are non-solutions.” Hansen...

Climate models are even more accurate than you thought The difference between modeled and observed global surface temperature changes is 38% smaller than previously thought There’s a common myth that models are unreliable, often based on apples-to-oranges comparisons, like looking at satellite...