Search results

Let's see, one uses his money and fame to save the world and another to to, what does Trump do of value again?

So now you are worshiping the shit pile that is Trump. Why am I not surprised.

So now you conservatives are against making money? Have you become communists now? Al Gore deserved the Nobel Prize. No question.

He is very concerned about the future of the earth and thinks getting away from fossil fuels is important and so is putting his money where it can do the most good. Gore is truly a great man. It is a catastrophe that he was not president. I am totally serious about this. Only a deluded...

So jem, do you still think that man has not caused the rapid rise in CO2 just as the industrial revolution started? Yes or no.

That is correct. He is very concerned about the future of the earth and thinks getting away from fossil fuels is important and so is putting his money where it can the most good. Gore is truly a great man.

Yeah the Koch bros just want what is good for mankind. They would stop making billions on fossil fuels if they thought that CO2 is bad for the planet.

Or taxed.

If your competitors cause catastrophic climate change they should be taxed. At least.

Solar and wind are getting very close. A slight nudge via a carbon tax would help immensely. A small cost now is certainly needed to prevent future catastrophe.

Yes there is. Tons of it. And not only one scientist is showing it, thousands are. That's why there is no debate about the basic truth of it anymore. You may be stuck in the seventies, but really, the science has moved on. But I don't expect a religious delusional like yourself to...

Not the accurate temps. Liar. Here are the real temps. From NASA. Exactly in line with the models. Liar. Why do you lie so much? Not getting into heaven that way.

So, for the folks watching at home. Jem thinks that man has not caused CO2 levels to rise.

Yes, there is no other way to create energy than fossil fuels.

FOCUS JEM FOCUS!!! We are not talking about what leads which here.... Do you believe this to be true or not? I mean YOU wrote it. "the level of co2 in the atmosphere... follows natural systems and not the co2 being produced by man. "

Here's the local forecast. And so far the models have been exactly correct. They have been underestimating sea level rise however.

So to be clear, jem thinks that man has not caused the sudden jump in CO2 levels over the last two hundred years and that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas. Even though physics says it is for the last two hundred years. And of course there is tons of science, theoretical and empirical, showing man...

Hey weasel...... Just to be clear about your lie here. You believe that the 40% increase in CO2 levels is not due to man. Because this is what you said. the level of co2 in the atmosphere... follows natural systems and not the co2 being produced by man. Now before you answer. Maybe you...

So jem, you are weaseling out again. Stop throwing up smoke screens. I would like for you to admit that are/were wrong when you wrote this lie. I mean what you said here is equivalent to saying up is down or black is white or conservatives are smart. "the level of co2 in the atmosphere...

So why didn't you post the nature article or a reporting of the Nature article from a unbiased reputable source? I'll tell you why. It's because you are a goddamned liar. Another thing you said... "the level of co2 in the atmosphere... follows natural systems and not the co2 being produced...