Search results

American Chemical Society "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem."

But we can't escape the reality that there has been no net detectable increase since about 1997 (or so), and that considerably weakens the probability of Hansen having been correct. ..... blah blah lot's of speech to text bullshit. An objective rational scientist would NEVER bring this up. ...

Not sure where you seeing warming starting in 1700. To my eye I don't see a change in trend until 1900. Perhaps you are looking at the pink line and that other one? I discount those as they are outliers. I don't see any definitive change until around 1900. But I suppose it depends on how...

Oh, but that is a very long term trend. Over the last thousand years the trend has generally been down as per the above chart I posted. There really is no natural component to the more relevant shorter term trend over the last two hundred.

What warming trend?

Of course you are too fucking stupid to grasp what they are saying and can't use even simple cause and effect logic but instead jump to whatever conclusion was drawn for you from your right wing site for ignorant assholes. from the authors.......and BTW they don't say it is the CAUSE of ISIS...

Sorry db but no, there is no natural warming trend since the 17th century. Essentially all the warming over the last two hundred years is from man.

American Physical Society "The evidence is incontrovertible: Lucrum is a moron. "

And here is one of jerm's and piehole's favorites.... It's the Sun, An Ice Age Cometh - Wait! OMG - It's the Insects! ... and more farce from WUWT Example One: How Anthony is an Ass Every now and then, Anthony Watts posts an actual science article, mainly for the purpose of ridicule. In...

Climate change denial is a denial or dismissal of the scientific consensus on the extent of global warming, its significance, and its connection to human behavior, especially for commercial or ideological reasons.[1][2] Typically, these attempts take the rhetorical form of legitimate scientific...

Yeah, let's pin our hopes on an asteroid hitting us rather than being roasted by GW.

American Geophysical Union The American Geophysical Union (AGU) statement, adopted by the society in 2003, revised in 2007,[54] and revised and expanded in 2013,[55] affirms that rising levels of greenhouse gases have caused and will continue to cause the global surface temperature to be warmer...

Bozo: NO. Salby is a climate scientist, has written a textbook thought reasonable. P.T.Barnum: YES. Salby has a well-documented history of financial chicanery, deception and unwillingness to listen to warnings. If he was increasingly unable to produce much good science, perhaps he moved to...

'The Subject's fifteen-year-long pattern of deceptive statements to his University and to NSF disguised his participation in entities and activities that existed for the purpose of maximizing his personal financial compensation and shielding the extent of his compensation from discovery or...

More on the fraud/fool Salby. Maybe piehole is Salby? Our investigation revealed that the subject, consistently and over a period of many years, violated or disregarded various federal andNSF award administration requirements, violated university policies related to conflicts and outside...

This is the guy piehole repeatedly refers to and praises........ Murry Salby: Galileo? Bozo? Or P.T.Barnum? Murry Salby fired from Macquarie, had been debarred by NSF “They laughed at Galileo … but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown” might be appled to Murry Salby, who until May was a...

In this article I'm going to show how silly Murry Salby's "hypotheses" are (as archived here). There's a lot of "wrong" with Salby's efforts but two things stand out the most in my view: Murry Salby is a greenhouse effect denier and Murry Salby thinks billions of tonnes of carbon can...

Following allegations of an overlap between funding applications, the National Science Foundation began an investigation in March 2005. It advised the University of Colorado, which sought information from Salby but he did not cooperate with this investigation. In October 2006 the university...

piezoe you are so full of shit that it's not even funny. Again with the fool/fraud/whore Murray Salby who the real scientists laugh at. Why is everyone of the scientists you refer a fool or fraud or whore to the fossil fuel interests? It's like if you say the name enough there will be some...

bite me you lying piece of shit.