Search results

Complete Bullshit http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/3M_HEAT_CONTENT/

Judith Judith Judith. An attention whore. She's not getting it at home I guess.

Complete nonsense. You are very deluded.

Yes, the central issue is that CO2 is very important ghg and we have raised it's levels by 40%. Why you don't understand this is a real mystery that is probably best left to your psychiatrist to figure out.

Just plain wrong. As usual when you speak about AGW. Climate science 101 is still alive and well. CO2 is still a ghg and positive feedback mechanisms are still firmly in place.

Among the top climate scientists yes there is. No question. Only completely ignorant morons deny that.

So then you admit that you don't know what a greenhouse gas is and are an idiot.

Speaking of morons, idiots and dolts. Lucrum takes top spot.

I'll say it again. If you think that AGW is a fantasy you are an idiot. A moron. An ignorant deluded dolt. Period.

I guess we should have some pity. First of all these deniers are idiots, another is that they really have nothing other than this stupid crap.

No you did not. You presented right wing trash.

The problem with idiots like GWB is that they read shit on right wing propaganda sites and uncritically accept it as true. For the same reason he also was sure tobacco was a healthy lifestyle until yesterday.

Yes, NEWS worthy you asshole. See the NEWS part? The PEER REVIEWED papers were another thing. You really have no interest in the facts do you? In the 1970s, the most comprehensive study on climate change (and the closest thing to a scientific consensus at the time) was the 1975 US National...

Scientists announced Monday that human-caused climate change contributed to and/or amplified nine of 2013's most extreme weather events, making one of the most definitive statements yet on the direct link between individual weather extremes and human-induced climate change. In a new report...

However, these are media articles, not scientific studies. A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total). Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming (Peterson 2008). The large majority of climate...

So global cooling predictions in the 70s amounted to media and a handful of peer reviewed studies. The small number of papers predicting cooling were outweighed by a much greater number of papers predicting global warming due to the warming effect of rising CO2. Today, an avalanche of peer...

Wrong.

A 1974 Time magazine article Another Ice Age? painted a similarly bleak picture: "When meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe, they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing...

Even way back in the seventies scientists knew this current man made global warming was likely to happen. The fact is that around 1970 there were 6 times as many scientists predicting a warming rather than a cooling planet. Today, with 30+years more data to analyse, we've reached a clear...

Can you say... mass extinction event?