Search results

The IPCC report is too conservative. Most of the top climatologists now believe that essentially all of the warming in the last hundred years is due to man. And yes we know that saturation levels of CO2 in water is relative to temperature. So what? Right now the oceans are absorbing, not...

I do not believe for a second that the expert (who?) said that. There is no direct quote and it's from the Daily Mail. Talk about shit journalism! You can find a lot of it at the Daily Mail.

The study doesn't say it will all be due climate change only that it will be a factor. One that increases with time. Most of the extinctions that have happened recently are not from climate change.

Yup, crap journalism. She left out the qualifier "familiar species". Like lions and rhinos. For a better look at the study. http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2015/06/19/75-percent-of-animal-species-to-be-wiped-out-in-sixth-mass-extinction Still, pretty grim.

I can't believe I'm saying this to you but....valid point. I don't know where they got that number because what I've seen is 1/6 of all species in a hundred years or so. I've never seen a 75% number. Irresponsible journalism. What else is new.

Well the experts believe that all the warming over the last hundred years is due to man. Your guess is worth doo doo. And the CO2 is not coming out of the oceans, it's going into it.

You know, with Trump as president, comedy routines will markedly improve. But the problem is that those who voted for him won't get the jokes.

The Anthropocene extinction event.

Before I can vote for him I need to know one thing. Is it a comb-over or a toupee. Or a toupee made to look like a comb-over. Inquiring minds want to know.

It's in there. And it's not a model.

You must be blind because I have posted this multiple times now. But of course we know the real problem is that you are a goddamn liar. http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm

Amazing. Now I see why you are a failed real estate lawyer. You have no reading comprehension. It's like someone asks you for a soda and you give him a rock and say it's soda. Basically, you're a goddamn liar. No publishing climatologist expressly denies man made global warming.

Picture of the twenty kids from Sandy Hook Picture of Wayne LaPierre holding up a gun and smiling.

I must say, even I am surprised that there really isn't single publishing (peer reviewed) climatologist that expressly denies AGW. Except that Russian guy who works for their oil industry so I don't include him.

Yes, I know and up is down and black white. Now take your meds.

Yes of course. And up is down and black white. Here jem, you can start here. https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=evidence%20of%20man%20made%20global%20warming

So now science fiction writers are climate scientists in jerm's psychotic mind. Amazing. So Jem...it must really bug you that not a single respected climatologist denies man made global warming. It makes your position seem really really stupid. Worthy of ridicule in fact.

One can tell it's a good scientific objective chart by the fact it says right up there on top " failed". That's always a good sign that the chart is good science. Where are the probability bands? Where is 2014? What temp data set is it? Jem, you are such a sheep. Like the Koch bros lap...

As we clearly see, there has been no pause and temps are still rapidly increasing and almost exactly within the models predictions. And the recent new highs last year not shown on this chart puts the temps even more within the center range of the models.

So, just to clear, because it's tough to pin down a slimey ideologically deranged libertarian extremist nutjob lawyer like you, you admit that no publishing climatologist denies man made global warming. Good you are making progress. Now you just have to understand that the models are still...