Search results

What I like about you liberals is that you're such a rational, erudite bunch. Michael Moore, in that respect, is your natural mascot.

Wrong. I refuted your arguments on a rational basis. You have ignored them. Now you resort to ad hominem... again. Weak.

Classic ad hominem. You can't refute the arguments so you attack the opposition's character. Fine but I don't plan on continuing the discussion if that's the case.

So you think that a mythical man in the sky creating the universe on a whim is more believable? It boggles the mind.

I know exactly what you mean. Route 4 in Bergen County has to be the worst. Miss your exit and you have to go five miles before you hit a u-turn. Worst road planning ever.

Shut up.

How does that disprove evolution?

I really have no idea what you're talking about. The theory of evolution states that genetics are the mechanism of change and that's proven by emprical evidence (i.e., that genes do in fact exist, they pass traits from generation to generation, they can mutate, etc.) There is nothing in...

There's not one. That's what I'm talking about. Can't prove a negative, now can I?

It's seems that every time I take my car out some moron cuts me off, almost hits me cuz he ran a light, or (this is true) stops dead in the middle of highway traffic (and not on the shoulder). New Jersey drivers - worst in the nation? I think our insanely high insurance rates support my...

Who cares? Call me when Janet flashes the real goods, if you know what I mean. Uh-thank-you-very-much.

Please. What's hurting is the idea that a super being that has not left one shred of physical evidence is believed to have created the universe in six days. (Before the concept of "day" was created, btw. A very neat trick.) Saying Darwinism/Evolution Theory is somehow hurting because the...

Looks like we'll test 1150 again this week. Will resistance hold? This is so exciting.

Twinkies would still be around.

Interesting article along these lines: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,109890,00.html

And how many theologians discovered the computer, space flight, vaccinations, or genetic engineering? It's a pithy little saying but it's completely wrong.

Can we just agree that if you eat too much YOU WILL GET FAT! OK, I feel better.

Science and religion are mutually excusilve because by definition religion is based on faith, not evidence, and is therefore irrational, while science is based on evidence and therefore rational. So arguing that they are not mutually exclusive is... er, irrational.

They funny thing is the other day I was joking around with a co-worker and said "suppose they find a watch." Anyway, had to be there.

No, wrong wrong wrong. How about that man as a rational being has the right to life? I bet you didn't think of that?