Search results

It exists a number of times per day. If I were to point it out to you, then you'd say I wasn't looking at it right. And I can't look at it right without guessing or guidance. Funny, I think others see my posts earlier today and yesterday as being constructive and seeking progress. You come in...

I'm not trying to invent anything new. I'm trying to understand. Without concrete examples to observe, I am left guessing. I made the post not to antagonize you, but to attempt to increase my level of understanding. NO WHERE IN THIS THREAD was it stated explicity that "the market not telling...

The problem is Mike, that these sequences absoslutely do NOT always play out. When we say WMCN, what really is being said is that something in the sequence must come next OR the sequence is no longer valid; and thus you get a WWT. If this statement is not correct, I hope Spyer will say so...

I stole that way from Spyder. Considering the market doesn't move it's pace, in a herky jerky fashion, I figure a given channel steepness can often be followed by a less steep channel. That is, if we have good pace down, that most likely not immediately going to be followed by good pace up...

nk, actually, it wasn't all that low, no where near DU levels. The data was just not congruent. In the instance I recall, the volume ebbs and flows of dominant and non-dominant simply were not there. So, the data sets were not stating anything with clarity at that point. Jander, I have...

thanks bi9, pro, ezzy and r/r for your replies. Be careful Ezzy, those bars do not fit definition of HVS at all, as volume was increasing for a number of bars, not decreasing. R/R, your view makes total sense. The reason I've fought that mentality for so long is that on various occaisions...

Any comments on how you read this vis a vis change/continuation. The prior bar is on decreasing volume, yet also an inside bar. Obviously, price is moving laterally during that bar and from prior close. Is it legitamate to say the RTL was broke on increasing volume on the black doji bar...

My effort today...

This is just too sweet a post to not acknowledge :)

IMHO entering on the DOM in this manner is the lowest risk thing you can do. Obviously, I'm stating this through my own filters and beliefs, and without benefit of actual success (yet). I was just reading Jack last night and was reminded about how the market moves from high s/n ratio to low s/n...

1) on the chart toolbar you can adjust empty space on right hand side of chart 2) for equities you should be looking at probably around 6 months of data 3) I'm not a current user, but I believe that daily and intraday charts based on the historic data are different charts and thus you...

CNMS2, this is precisely my point. I created a 12 minute video which outlines how I'm currently looking at these situations and a sentence by sentence review of the quote from Spyder. A number of you have requested I do a volume/gaussina video, but currently I have too many unanswered...

I have been restricting myself to studying only ES p&v and am posting this question because I think it's relavent to this month's laterals discussion. If not, please feel free to ignore. I have read and reread this parapraph, and continue to be stumped by what it's saying. If the blue arrows...

Ah, sorry if I mispoke. I suspect then most of the others who post with that jargon don't mean it to be anything special.

bmonte, not case sensitive, different symbols for the same thing: r2r = r2R = R2R etc.

I haven't quit, just got real quiet and focused. I can't say that my efforts are producing progress or not. But, upon reading this in reply to a bunch of people wanting to see r/t trading I just couldn't help myself. Mak, I can send you several dozen pm's/emails elicited from the production...

I'd like to point something else out to the group, as Spyder brought it up in one of his posts in reply to me this evening. I had never intended on saying this publicly, but his suggestion that I saw live in Tucson somthing akin to what I feel is necessary is just plane false. While in...

This is clear beyond belief. It actually kind of shakes me up a lot, because it seems like no amount of practice will clear this up. Making mistakes is one thing, just plane missing huge chunks of what I need to pay attention to (which is what I'm doing) is quite another. There's a saying...

I wasnt' going to comment, line by line, but I'm kinda flabbergasted by the attitude here, so in my own defence here goes: 1) I was not trading. I was annotating pt3's. No where did anyone EVER say pt3's work different at low volume levels. 2) I'm fully aware of what you point out. I was...

I just realized, I got kind of hornschwaggled again. I asked about increasing volume on a pt3 being a strict rule. No reply.