Search results

i'd imagine those msg limits are for orders. if not, you'd prob want to run data from another acct. however, if you're using l2 for trade/routing decisions, you prob don't want to be using ib for data anyway.

just be alexander, frank has you on repeat. for equities, no info needs to be disclosed for regulatory requirements. the rest of what you said are your opinions, i'll leave it at that. i'm not making anyone into anything that there isn't already some basis for. if you or others don't want...

and yet, i managed to resist the urge to name myself after dierdorf... fk irony though i guess, huh.

the bickering has actually been on topic. the ethics of how and why strategies are being shared is being hashed out. there have long been rumors of strategies being outright stolen from traders by props. for instance, a certain 'well known reputable firm' was accused by a group of koreans back...

ok, so, why say the below if sharing is optional? i'm not interrogating you. your statements are just contradictory.

i think we all get what a concept is. that wasn't the question. the question was, why you would consider "sharing the concept", if the point is to assess risk?

esc sorry, that's not a standard in the industry, gs or otherwise. i run a small hft shop, we run through an ib that clears with a major. never was i asked for ip, and from the speaking i do with other shops, that's not how it's handled there either. it would be ridiculous to even suggest it...

your last statement sums it up. most auto guys have spent serious time/money developing profitable systems and their is considerable ip involved. you would not just give this away without being compensated, either via buyout, licensing, profit sharing, whatever. if your b/d is sharing this ip...

you're not being clear, because you're not addressing the "share some of the concept" part. why are you "sharing some of the concept" if your interest lies in protecting the platform?

the truth? well, either the above is a lie, or the below is a lie... they both can't be true: [/b] the only thing being beaten is you and the bright reputation... and no one is doing that but yourself. if you want it to stop, you should stop posting to this thread.

it's not possible to "share some of the concept" if you have absolutely no idea what the trader is trying to accomplish. you're contradicting yourself. regardless, your example is incredibly unambiguous, but its good that you clarified what the bright's idea of 'vague' is. since you know...

don, that, and your prior explanation, aside from being completely convoluted and confusing, don't reference appropriating strategies due to risk. your words now hold very little resemblance to your original statement. you keep intentionally leaving this quote out when you quote me: [/b] this...

relative to what, iraq? rio is dangerous as hell, ipanema or not. ever heard of arrastoes? no amount of 'common sense' prevents you from unwittingly being part of the craziness that goes on there. they're either going to need to heavily subsidize the traffickers or it will be full out...

that's a really good question. one i've asked and thought quite a bit about. it could be argued that the first and second world wars were the beginning in the more dramatic changes in sentiment. with young men off at war, and women more and more taking on male roles for longer periods of...

grooming doesn't matter. the guy could wear a thong and scarves and still be strong in the relationship. a woman's role is to support her man's values, his ethics. a man's role is to provide those values and guide his woman into following them. if he provides no guidance, then she defaults to...

since we're generalizing... it's because american men are weak. a woman's attitude will always reflect her man's tolerance for it. with a strong pimp hand, american women behave well and will do the opposite of your list and more (albeit with a bit more bitching when being broken). it's...

we share, i do not share? this isn't english grammar i'm familiar with. so, you personally don't share strategies/concepts, but bright trading does? are you seriously trying to make that distinction or are you trying to make freud look good? your risk distinctions have no relevance to this...

was it the sad panda part that gave it away? i knew i should've left that out. very bad spin don, you have very little to gain coming at me. this is about something seriously questionable you said. my credibility is irrelevant as i'm not trying to convince anybody of anything. you, on the...

don't confuse comedy for anger. i like it dry and black. your wit must be above level 10 though to perceive this (scale 0-100). yea, i washed out at bright and want to blame don. i took my 5k acct to 7k, but then they stole my strategy and frontrunneded me. i'm a sad panda. class is when...

respect is earned. you lost respect when you spent 5 pages trying to avoid dealing with the fact that you said you share your guys' strategies. i think that's crap, and gave you the opp to explain yourself. you chose not to, and somehow you expect better treatment. posting pictures of...