Search results

Those are facts from the news, twitter and reddit.

So the facts are now. Hispanics are white-supremacist Hispanics are neo-nazis. MAGAtards are hispanics. These are your facts, not mine. According to YOUR facts, Hispanics don't sound like very good people if they're white-supremacist, neo-nazi's, and MAGAtards. Which they are now. So...

I was trying to stick to the facts. Bugenhagen usually brings nothing to the conversation.

What's unsettling for me is seeing how retarded people are on this political board.

Just shedding a light on the truth that the suspect wasn't white. That is all.

Racial and Ethnic Categories and Definitions for NIH Diversity Programs and for Other Reporting Purposes https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-15-089.html Hispanic or Latino. A person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or...

One has a neck tattoo the other doesn't. The image says the suspect is a "white 35 year old." Clearly not a white 35-year old. The twitter link and the picture were supposed to be in the same post.

Haha this guy is white

Elon is asking the obvious questions and wondering the same thing everyone else is.

Suspect was a hispanic white-supremacist neo-nazi. Got it. Great investigative work.

My source tells me hispanics aren't white supremacists. That's literally an oxymoron my source says. Dumbest thing I've ever read. Those people are stupid.

Those articles literally tell you nothing. Zero.

WSJ propaganda https://www.wsj.com/articles/texas-...yle-rifle-in-attack-4ec74709?mod=hp_lead_pos9 Authors of the "paid-media" https://www.wsj.com/news/author/ginger-adamsotis https://www.wsj.com/news/author/dan-frosch https://www.wsj.com/news/author/sadie-gurman

He shot dead several people. The media can report on his gang tattoo. The "paid-media" entertained the conspiracy that the suspect had "white-supremacist ideologies." The WSJ offered no explanation for the unsubstantiated claim in the article. All the while, the WSJ had no report or...

I mean what you posted is what the media does. Leaves out information. The tattoo was in plain sight. Wouldn't you think an obvious question for the 'paid media' be: "There was a tattoo on the suspects hand. What was the tattoo. What does the tattoo appear to represent?" If you look at...

This was you to my post. There's a good chance my post was correct.

White supremacist links, come on. So what's the tattoo? A simple question and you can't answer it.

Do you care about the truth? Look at your thread. This is your thread. So what's the tattoo?

So tell us what the tattoo is. So far there's been a lot of wrong information in this thread. This is your thread. Do you care about honest information and truth in your posts or not?