Search results

website http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/047143051X/ref=cm_cr_dp_2_1/103-8292879-3349461?v=glance&s=books&vi=customer-reviews this is a pretty good book. I did not read it though. Yet...

review section?

He was posting in real time in the chatroom that he mentioned in this journal. I happened to participate in his calls yesterday. They were not phony. It's a good idea to check facts before you post here. Not to mention that it is also a good way to enhance your credibility.

Based on my 5 min ES chart you could not take this short sooner than aroun 12:10, yet you are talking about much earlier times. Are you sure you are correct? Well, I guess your time zone is different than mine (EST), so that's OK. Sorry...

In order to know the RR ratio you need to know both the risk and reward. Your risk is predetermined. How about the reward? Do you set some targets too? How?

Makes sense, sounds pretty complete, thanks for sharing.

Well, my opinion is this: inandlong has no rules and Magna plainly cannot even reason logically. Both are bad for these simple reasons: they are petty, partial, not consistent, and way too visible. OK, so perhaps inandlong has some rules, if we can count inconsistency as one of them. A good...

Well, that's true. One reason is psychological, I believe. The more you have the more conservative you may become. It's not only the method, but guts as well.

That is correct.

Well, it's not true they are talking with certainty about such things and if they do talk they are as bogus as Jack Hershey. Scientists know very well the limitations of their disciplines. Black holes are hypothetical objects, they may not exist, but the scientists believe they do exist. Of...

This has to be the worst understanding of the relativity theories I have come across on the Internet. It's just the opposite: the way time flows depends on the observer, in particular on his motion. This is evident already in Special Relativity and gets even more evident in General Relativity...

You guys seem to be forgetting our newest trading superstar the Scientist... If Sabena cannot do it, I bet (1 YM tick of monetary value) that the Scientist can...

Good reading, entertaining and provocative, of little practical value though. If you have already learned what money management is about you don't need Taleb at all. And even if you have not learned it yet, start from something else and use Taleb as an additional reading.

Yes, the fix can be found. I had the same problem. Did the search for 'RPC Service Fatal Error' using Google. Followed the steps in the info I have found. The info is too detailed to recover it from my memory, but if you do what I did you are most likely to find the same fix for your problem.

No, but that may mean that they are probably not Fast_Responding_Traders. :D

Well, I live here too. I am not a racist, but other colors are not more impressive either. Let's be fair...

of success when mediocrates begin to insinuate in a more or less transparent way that you have ulterior motives. Hey, Electric dude, I bet that with your attitude you are one of Jack Hershey's grouppies. Are you saying that what Jack is doing on this board is not because of his gigantic ego...

In case you did not notice, the handle of the thread originator is no_pm_please...

But I still have to see him on Leno (it's still to be aired here in Cali), so will not comment at this point.

How do you know that? Have you backtested it? Or perhaps someone else has?