Search results

He's a white Republican who loves Kansas, it's fine

Problems: Cherry-picked examples; No strategy; Not profitable!

Trump: I like older planes because they have been tested and have been around. Also, one of the most expensive planes in world (when he purchased it): https://financesonline.com/8-most-expensive-planes-in-the-world-how-much-does-it-cost-to-fly-like-the-elite/

autoerection duz wurks

You could say the same thing to eagles and other birds of prey (each with their own "strategies"). Various Ospreys that have been studied have had up to 70% success rates, and rarely if ever below 40%. This is far higher than Bald Eagles, who will make many attempts at snagging a fish before...

What happened to your high IQ?

It's the product cornerstone promotes :D (45 mentions in 83 posts)

2:1 RR with a 30-40% win rate is pretty much breakeven.

The number of days traded above 300 days is unspecified. Chances are there's a high drop off rate. The study is flawed. It's the equivalent of studying the arithmetic ability of children, but discontinuing at age 2 and concluding 99% of children cannot do arithmetic.

The EU is flexible in extending the deadline; it's possible it could be extended well into next year. The PM is very much on the side of leave! He's being blocked from all sides. Either another referendum or a general election is likely. Nigel Farage's party did not win by a landslide in UK...

So true! Not so different from traders.

Running a backtest just isn't the same as manual trading. Manually trade and become profitable at that before attempting to run backtests based on simplistic entry criteria and simplistic trade management rules. I say this is a professional software developer.

Where did the moving averages go? Channels now? You've previously shown you do have the ability/potential to make money, but you're still jumping from one idea to the next, as if you're still searching for something.

Agree, it can be smart to quit. The biggest risk a trader takes is the time spent learning at the beginning, not knowing if it will pay off. It could be years wasted. Then again...

Sticking at something is persisting. Quitting after 300 days is not persisting, relatively compared to the time profitable traders have put it. You can persist at something without it being futile as with your example. Persisting can be becoming better at something by learning from mistakes...

The study shows that day trading is virtually impossible for those who haven't persisted very long.

They do work in real time! Price interacts with a moving average in real time. It doesn't matter that a MA is derived from historic price.

Why the agro? He's answered your questions, posted a video and he's previously mentored someone on ET, who in the end was the one who decided to not continue. Nothing he does will ever be enough for you. Seems like a genuine offer.

Impressive consistency!

Your name suggests you can shed some light on this. Go on, you go first...