Search results

You're very confused by my post. I did not mention any Marxist that i know of. In fact I've never read that much of Marx, but 99.9% of the population hasn't read any. Including I would guess all the people who use the term Marxist for anything that doesn't describe pure Laissez-Fair. Which is...

yes this is the failure of supply side economics. Also the myth that rich people or corporations create jobs so we must cut there taxes. American companies sit on 1.8 trillion in cash and yet some how a small tax cut will add just enough to the coffers to create a hiring boom. Only the consumer...

And the corporate and financial elite who are one in the same

I will guarantee you the average U.S. Senator is worth more than you. what a egotistic idiotic thing to say it actually shows the stupidity of successful traders. Look at the economic cabinet of the white house for the last 30 years, all so called winners of the private sector. You want me to...

This is typical Malthusian talk and lacks a clear understanding of what wealth is and how it is made. Thomas Malthus ( who plagiarized almost word for word the work of Giammaria Ortes the Venetian charlatan) made popular the idea of a carrying capacity of earth. Based on his calculations around...

which pretty much shoots the whole lower taxes creates jobs theory

even with QE 1,2,3,4 the money supply will still be contracting at a faster pace then monitization. Unless banks start multiplying the fresh money into loans. it makes no difference if you swap the debt for money

see you are a protectionist

But the top benefit overwhelmingly from the private money system. you must look at the aggregate

as stated before your only recognizing one form of WD there are others

you have been given many examples. you chose to think that private gain is government gain

maybe they would rather be poor than killed. no one suggested that only the rich steal. The poor steal from the poor and the rich as well. Your taking comments and projecting your image of then and assuming certain things, but no one is immune to this behavior

no i didn't the benefactors of the stealing were private individuals not the government. The government was just the conduit if this didn't exist another conduit would be found. Are you saying that if the Gov didn't exist private wealth would give up stealing? No, It would just be a lot...

yes, too bad theories are substituted for historical precedent

it works the other way. How can you have had stolen something if you have NOTHING..Someone could have had something and then have it stolen and be left with NOTHING, but not the other way around. you need to think of the before and after to work this properly

3.3 trillion a simple search would yield this http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-01/fed-will-name-recipients-of-3-3-trillion-in-emergency-aid-during-crisis.html http://epostmedia.com/federal-reserve-forced-to-reveal-bailout-recipients-of-3-3-trillion/375127/...

so do I who has the power to impose their will on you. one who has money, political power or one who does not. Capitol will always use it's power to create a monopoly this is the natural evolution of capitalism.

great, show me one instance in history were society has achieved what you speak of.i guess in your utopia political power is part of capitalism or doesn't exists. You delve into your fantasy utopia all you want but it has no place in reality. so you want to be a dictator based on the small...

you can apply this to rich or well connected then any other group of individuals.

i'm using your morals that it is wrong to steal (but you only use it in the context of the poor from the rich). if you consider the bank bailout stealing. then taking that money back would be justice not stealing or is there a time limit on your morals. A king or nobility that conquers land...