Search results

was the volume electronically executed or block traded, it should say. the reason I am asking is bc I would be interested in getting access to it electronically but have not been able to find it yet....I don't want to rely strictly on the otc market, which is dominated by the users and...

What i am saying is I would not go long spot goldusd bc eurusd is going up...rather i would look simply at goldeur and manage the volatility on that into the portfolio...as an example. There is a fine line so let me clarify. When you are running money, as you may know already you have...

Zero volume since the beginning of its creation lol

I used to get sucked into those moves...that's why i only day trade opportunistically now when jobbing around my core positions kicked out from my system. the worst part are the iceberg orders that front run you forcing you to pay up amd then the liquidity dissaplers... thats why now i only...

Corrext it was heat rate not spark, apologies....it had caught my eye bc i wanted to see if i could trade it. When i asked you back then about how you individually traded not being an ecp, your response indicated it was the first time you ever heard about ecp rules...then you went and removed...

Ok but you said there was more liquidity on tt than the broker mkt....that is false....i asked you to tell me the contract so i could check tick data and u failed to do so...at the time your claim on spark spread was made, the rules on swaps and elegible contract particiants would make it...

The other day i wanted to short sugar pa, but did cfd bid/ask was too wide so i went futures.

I understand your point 100%....i truly do... Let each trader make their own choice

you can exit on middle or otherside...how You create entries or exists up to you after u define your risk profile...feel free to post an example and we can paper trade it next week

It would be difficult to show with empericaal evidence....the algos just are doing what humans used to do... bank were notorious for running in stops and even collaborating jointly...dodd frank is a good thing from that perspective but in effective as someone else is doing it better already

One side of consistent with the trend bias for that time frame...on the extremes This ntg new, again just helping those who have not gotten it yet I do pay up when i have a discretionary view but that is when im using my gut sometimes....

I agree 100% as a result i had to change the way i traded bc i started losing money. What i meant was over a longer time frame, the market cycles have not really changd

Well i disagree......i look at it from the calculation above....its simple math....if u come up with diff figures then good for you

I think his comment above about last nights webinar on how to bootstrap FI futures was not only professional but, if actually true, then very interesting as alot of guys cant hedge using Dvo1 calculations, including myself. If he just sticks to clean marketing that his course enhances product...

i agree with you 100%, I think his course maybe worth it for some who can afford it, but what J-law fails to see is that Bone has been caught lying as a marketing ploy to attract c lients.. as long as he does not lie and oversell, his course may be fine.....

where you may be correct is that if the cfd firm knows you are a hammer, and you start trading size, they will widen the bid/ask on the platform....but then you just have to calculate when the tax free pay off is no longer worth it...... for the case of a small trader, which is what the person...

i disagree in the case of cfd's, you have to look at it statistically over time. using wti as an example i said the future was a 2 tick bid/ask while the cfd was 7 ticks. so if you buy 1 lot of futures, you can calculate your bid/ask loss to be 1000 * .02 = 20$ if buy the equivalent exposure...

as mentioned above i alluded to the fact i was also just a leveraged long only guy. from that i learnt and evolved. today i am a true long short, market neutral.

not complex, just have to understand the logic. but it is based on a mathematical calculation and rules around it. from a conceptual standpoint, it just tries to achieve what a channel index does....but it goes to the next level and spits out buys and sells signals with entries and stops in...

@JTrades idk, I can only tell you what I do.... when I started out in my career, I tried to do a lot of cross asset analysis and analysis correlations... from 2005-2009'sh I would say that this worked well for a lot of discretionary funds bc the global macro themes spilled over so heavily...