Search results

How can you be so sure? 100 years in modern era is very very long period of time, and in 21st century it will be huge. You cannot predict what is going to happen 10 years from now and you think you can plan everything for 100 years ahead. That won't happen. To put you in the perspective, get...

I store it as binary data. Here's how: one file per day HEADER: first 3 bytes are date (year+1900, month and day) then 3 bytes (unsigned) is the time of the first tick in the day (time is measured in seconds since 00:00) then 4 bytes (unsigned) for the price of the first tick and...

You know, the world had to end oh-so-many times. But it never happened. Whatever happens, the condition is always temporary. Be it a world war, famine, plague, cold war, soviet union, NWO (?) - everything has its end. It's not like everything's going to end with one world government for good...

Yes, you are right. I was referring to chemical reactions (obviously), not nuclear ones. Carbon and oxygen can be fused, but the reaction is impractical and useless (see http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/Binding_energy_curve_-_common_isotopes.svg ). For the thermonuclear...

CO2 cannot be a source of energy. Ever heard of energy conservation law? If you burn coal or oil product, carbon connects with oxygen and that releases energy. If you want to split CO2 back into carbon and oxygen, you have to use the same amount of energy. Otherwise it would be a source of...

Cold fusion and zero point energy is bull crap. While the DT, that is part of your username, is a viable thermonuclear reaction, Deuterium + Tritium = Helium + lots and lots of clean and inexhaustible energy for everyone for ever. Check this out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER this one's...

The way I see it, even the people who have all the power don't want to destroy the planet (WW3). If you think a little deeper, what would they achieve by that? Is it worth it? What do they get? Material stuff and power over all? They already have these things, so why destroy your environment...

That's basically it. The reason is that a newbie is not unnecessarily overcomplicating everything at the very beginning. Then, when he begins "analysing" the charts, the losing ensues. This is because he's starting to look at the price lines, that are really not continuous lines, but just...

LOL I haven't seen any discussion here yet. Just some weird fucked up conspiracy nut theory about predicting earthquakes and other nonsense like rich dudes surviving nuclear war and becoming losers just "like you" (and probably bald too, due to the radiation; but that's geopolitics duuude).

So yeah, imagine you're a kickboxer. You get your head kicked and punched a lot. It translates to a long long series of small brain injuries. Then you become so dumb that you actually think it has got to do anything with trading LOL

You proved nothing. There are so many forms of TA, most of it is bullshit (here we agree). But if you are serious and do serious objective research before putting any money then it's completely different story.