Search results

This is going to be first & last message to you in this thread - Allaces, you have just made yourself look stupid, A) by assuming & B) by somehow believing that you have created MACD & came up with a 0 line cross concept. I simply expressed how I view & use a 0 line cross, which seems to be a...

You have failed to see logic, that's all. I have never disputed your coin tossing odds, go back and reread. I am certain you have & managed to understand what I was referring to, it's u who is being stubborn now. As I said you are that nasty kid that needs to have a final say in anything, so go...

You ain't no trader posting shit like that all the time, you have nothing to prove your trading live, so this following message will keep appearing all the time from now on just to cheese you off as it is bang on the money: Allaces28 - The Paper Trader Annonymous

I never said I did make money that would be worth mentioning on ET, I do trade real money though with wider spreads that most are using & doing it pretty well. SPM is not a solid system because the rules always remained a bit vague the way you presented them, what I use is MACD 0 line cross on...

it's the opposite, neither him nor you are articulate enough and both are ugly, hence the need for a cheap Asian whore

another BUT, hm, OK.

I am all up for a trial, I can assure you that there will be a lot of coincidental hands dealt that will result being a winner if you stick to a table posted earlier, a helluva lot of coincidences. I just don't like the word coincidence, it doesn't fit. And that's all I said, again, I did not...

I recall you advocating the opposite approach whenever you where questioned as to the reasons why this or that 0 liner didn't turn out to be profitable, you said something like this: - You have to know which ones to take & the ones not to. Also questions used to come from some automators...

well I ain't as far as I am concerned, the record of the version of SPM I am using is exceptionally good, just because I would miss an occasional run by opting out of taking most 0 liners, doesn't bring flaw into the variation SPM of my preference.

No, total BS. Everybody knows that longer hold periods are more prosperous in comparison to a short lived trade, which you are out of prematurely more often than not. Forbes lists confirm this. You must be one of those fucking geniuses that dispute that. Trouble is most of you have no real money...

That is a marvelous assumption

Ah, you must believe I am overcomplicating the original SPM, in that case I can only say this, I would rather take less trades & by doing so have more trades resulting in a nice chunky profit, not just 1-2 points here and there on most & a lot less commission to pay out.

I sense you are 28T, so enlighten me please. After all you did say that I was looking at it, unless you decrypt I don't know what tp tell you?

CLM being what?

Sure, in that case... 3rd lower peak + divergence creating an almost ultimate culmination obviously prepping longer time frames to a rewarding sell-off. Multiple failures to break HOD, picture perfect.

nice real-time post LOL

no, I actually meant the BUT, single T. Cute ass BTW, yours?

yep, yet another but

in that case you couldn't have taken the last short because the 0 line cross took place within lunch time hours, you are too funny, now you will come up with another BUT.

hehe, also I remember you previously using discretion in decision making, now you "take them all" apart from lunch time ones, well that's hardly all now LOL