Search results

What ain't?

True, you can not tell the outcome. But experience, study and research will tell you what the probability of a successful outcome will be. And if that probability is high enough, the price movement will tell you if the entry should be made.

So what do you claim to be more valuable than experience and probability?

No, not at all. The entry is based on probability. That does happen. You wait for the next opportunity. You can't catch all the fish in the sea. All you need to know is what happens in the vast majority of cases. True, but only as the exception(1 out of 100 cases), I do enter in that manner...

I could be wrong, but from the above , and based on what you said earlier about having to make a split second decision, it sounds as though you are entering on breakouts. Is that correct?

You're not buying bananas in a grocery store. So rather than compare one stock with another, just buy the one that most closely meets the requirements of the setup in your plan. If you are trading stocks, this would be a questionable approach. Try to enter when the price comes to you, and not...

When you freeze, what are you doing? You're thinking, right? What are you thinking about? Are you analyzing this setup that you know works 90% of the time? Are you doubting or questioning the setup? Are you thinking "What if......"? Are you looking for confirmation that the setup will work? Are...

Ain't that the truth!! Also I think Baron has been cracking down more than in the past.

I could be wrong but don't you get the feeling that there is less of that stuff now than there was in the even recent past?

Yeah, and his words of trading wisdom were so strong in his writings that even his Texas accent came through!!

As candlestick analysis is no longer the fad, what they use is much of the same as in the west. Old school western TA, MA's, indicators such as RSI, MACD, Stochastic, Momentum,Parabolic etc. Also Bollinger Bands and Ichimokukinkouhyou.

パソコンの知識不足！(笑）

Here's what I posted (that came out black) yesterday on page 1. Oh well, just one of those mysteries of the universe, I guess!! @Redneck @Xela @NoDoji Ah, I see now. My keyboard must have been in Japanese mode. I should have noticed that the @ was slightly larger. @Redneck ＠Redneck...

I did that yesterday and it came out black. Today it's red. Can't figure out what I did differently. @HobbyTrading

He ran back into the woods to lick his wounds! Don't waste your time.

＠Redneck ＠Xela ＠NoDoji

You need to keep in mind the difference in the circumstances that establish the prices at the open and close verses that of the high and low and which has the bigger effect on the trend. That, of course, would be the high and low. You may find it interesting to learn that while most of the...

But the poster wouldn't get the Like

Anyone interested in this book should read no later than the 6th edition. The reason being that the jerk who got the rights to the book after the original authors died did an excellent job of ruining a good book from the 7th edition on.

As Xela stated, you may be basing your question on incorrect information. Additionally, your assumption that speculative volume is required for patterns to form is truly questionable. If that were the case, there would be no patterns in investment grade stocks, would there? But there certainly...