Recent content by WchPl

Hi to all Here is my result since I started the sim : Traded the RDBMS method in real time for 18 days with 10 days of wins and 8 days of losses with an overall profit/loss of -8 points.

When we last discussed about pace lines, there was a code related to it. A code to put in the pine editor of trandingview. Unless you're talking about something else, just know that currently, TV impedes me to add this code and says there are too much instruments on my display. Lastly, when I...

As for PRV I have what I showed in a prior post in answer to one of your posts. As for pace lines, I also have them but can't put them on the chart due to my Trading view account current limitations, but in a few days I'll subscribe to Pro so that I'll be able to add the pace lines. Anyway I...

I understand this very well. Hmm.. Not sure why you're saying this. I answered that there's a possibility to have A>>C>>G if G conditions are met, and there's also a possibility to have A>>C>>C if G conditions are not met. If the second option is not possible, how could C node repeat ? I know...

I took 2 days off. It was necessary. Smoking cessation is hard these days. The way I see D now, is that it’s a point at the end of an n+(at least)1 bar that follows an n bar that was either under B or C status. Reviewing the Cycle 1 softened version 3 by JH, I’d say that : B goes to F, C goes...

:( ... I talked too quick.. It will technically be quite impossible for me until next Monday.

In reference to “On OR Before”, your answer is in your write-up. A bar before n would be n-1, n-2, etc. Node D has two places that it’s referenced, that’s the ‘OR’. Which Node D is ‘On’? Which Node D is ‘Before’ In an effort to hone, feed, reconsider and finally understand that node D : what...

I appreciate the quality of your message, will take it into a count and give you thanks for that.

So you confirm what I had understood. The « OR », so what I had named the alternative, is for the fact that the trough we search for can either be on prior bar or before prior bar. Sorry about the redundance, it’s for me : on is for « on bar n », while before is for « prior/earlier to bar n » =...

By the way I think it's ok now

The following is yesterday's work. Next post will be the attempt to answer the questions exposed in post prior to this one. Today, I’m not in the best conditions for working efficiently. It’s an euphemism. I just try to do what I can with the conditions that are gathered and at the moment I...

Improved version. Manifestly, the problem in linking items when speaking the Cycle 1 language, surges at the same kind of moment. Tomorrow I'll dig this. Plus, I'll add some variations making S node among others appear. Apart from that, I can give another interpretation to what I noticed about...

I DD and decide one thing : « building confidence in knowing what you know » means « build on what you know » = build what you know from what you know = place what you know that is here and see the remaining areas, and then compare to the remaining items that, deductively, MUST fit into theses...

So, D node is a simple look back. What creates dissonance to me is when next to this statement made by Sprout, I put JH’s statement that has an alternative. What am I referring to ? I am referring to JH saying in the 3x5 that D node establishes reference trough on bar n OR BEFORE. This « or...