Recent content by traderwann

FYI, it is impossible to take any criticism on any level (historical, moral, etc) from a person who not only fails to grasp the very basics of a book but can somehow manipulate it into the complete opposite. Once again 99.9% of the time any criticism of the Bible will be out of context. For...

Cmon FT. You are only embarassing yourself if you can't tell the difference between in context and out of context. You can choose not to reply, but realize the implication is you are as dumb as a door knob and you did it to yourself. That's ok, well all have our hour. All the best.

Whether a source is reputable depends on the information, not the other way around. So you can't say "there are no REPUTABLE sources" because that implies that any one source is beyond question, that this one source can be depended on instead of depending on the CONTENT. The content makes the...

If you really want to know post me privately or ask a question that is not easily answered by a basic internet search. Do that search and ask something more specific, I will gladly answer. You are touching on something important, but doing so from a perspective that lacks information that is...

Prove it instead of acting like a "god" and just saying so like you are beyond question. Sigh. So far there are zero indications that I have a long way to go. So far, whenever I show a tiny bit of intelligence you reel back in anguish and yell "babbler" look at the "babbler" who is "babbling"...

Yes, I will take your insults as frustration and view it like a father would a screaming child. So can I take "screaming" non-reply as me finding something that gives you pause to think and consider? If so, that's cool, that's really all that one can do in an open dialogue. I just want to...

Yep. Guilt by association = DOH! Another athiest showing they could never pass a basic logic course. This is the point I started posting with. Most of the internet stuff floating around that is anti-Christian is just made up, out of context, deceitful, proven inaccurate, etc. Sure, there...

So can I take the non-reply as me finding something that gives you pause to think and consider? If so, that's cool, that's really all that one can do in an open dialogue. I just want to make sure.

So far my experience shows that yes that is one of my strengths. Let's hope that only improves with time. There are CURRENT reputable sources of information that are purposefully anonymous because they want to focus on the subject matter, the content of the story, instead of the author or...

I would gladly explain if you would ask a question! All you did is repeat yourself, just like last time. If you don't understand what I mean please ask, I would very gladly explain. I can't explain though because all you did is just repeat. So all I can do is repeat. Please, tell me what you...

I'm missing something, what's meant by this argument?

Thank you for adding to my point that stubborn belief systems influence a free market much more than 99.9% realize considering how little they know about them and psychology and their influence.

Technically there is separation, yes. What I meant was just like the relationship between two businesses, even though there are competitors to all options, you make a decision who you want to partner with. Once that is done it is best to consider your partner as a small stakeholder in your...

You don't need to discuss the author to discuss the content. The POINT is to discuss the content without discussing WHO wrote it or said it, whether it speaks of a fictional character to prove a point or a real character to prove a point, just to focus on the content and the point being made...

I've wondered about this for a while and while I still don't get it, what I've learned is that Carlin is totally taking a comedic SPIN on things. There is not much in scripture that supports that interpretation when looked at as a whole and in context. It's like reading any book today and...