Exactly, Paul not getting 1st was a definite sign that there was massive voter fraud. Great point. You know I heard from a guy that there was a massive conspiracy to make him lose. It's so true.
I mean it can't be that people don't approve of his ideas. It has to be a coverup! Oh crap my...
Sir sir, your question doesn't make sense. Are you trying to say that our president didn't have those qualifications either before coming to office? Well, we know how that turned out.
Being able to give a speech with passion is a skill, but not a qualification allowing one to run the country. What does he know about business? Trade? Taxes? Foreign diplomacy?
Don't confuse ambition and ego with substance.
Last time I looked it was votes that got someone elected not how much the they fundraised.
Ron Paul consistently polls under 5% in National polls, no amount of fundraising is going to help that. He is a fringe candidate that has no chance of being nominated.
I like how Ron Paul talks about cutting back spending yet has attached $400 MILLION in earmarks this year. It's not his ideas that get him re-elected by his district, it's the pork he brings back to it.