Recent content by tommcginnis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Herzberg The opposite of Satisfaction is not DIS-Satisfaction, but NO Satisfaction. The opposite of Dissatisfaction is not Satisfaction, but NO Dissatisfaction. Good results will provide you with Satisfaction. Good profits will only deflate...

So, nobody's heard of 'synthetics'? Do I have that right? :rolleyes:

As usual, Mr. Overnight, sir: you hide your genius under a bushel basket -- along with the end of a hooka hose: Alllll those retail spaces..... Alllll those leases -- a whole *network* of established locales, each of which carries an intrinsic cohort of gaming users (now both male AND female)...

"Gimme a break." You are not the first one to post this sort of noise, but as a full-time trader, you are always struggling to put food on the table -- each and every day. (There are loud, odious, exceptions to that rule here on ET -- the ones who grow suddenly silent when their trades...

• Quit until you have a sufficient clue as to what you are doing, such that you can provide a detailed question about where you might've gone wrong. (You have not provided any detail in your OP....) • PAPER TRADE. Fergawdsakes. Get some consistency going before you go live. • EXPECTANCY is...

"Profit": wrong goal. "Profitable": correct goal. Always favor process over results.

Motley Fool are pretty much the heart of HODL.

The phrasing smacks of Investopedia cuteness. :confused: But whenever an option contract is "sold", it is also being "purchased" from the counterparty's view. (As per any good/service in any market.) At any time, there will be precisely as many "sellers" as "purchasers" for any set of option...

If I were Jack Ma, I'd be hanging at some Asian-heavy midwestern U.S. university town, teaching adjunct Python classes to surly+unappreciative freshmen, retiring from the dowdy in-town apartment to the acres of the "absentee-owner" working farm located in a bucolic little river valley 20...

Considering your comments, you might think about leaning back on some game theory thoughts -- something like, "Crying 'Wolf': Tests of 4 Different Reputation & Hysteresis Shocks in Global Currency Markets" Explain the idea, run four different evaluations, write up the results, hope for a bit of...

"Break out the Foil Beanies!!!!" Ferchrisakes. Can't we wait til the pieces of Nashville's 5G genius are collected up, before we inspire the next panty-pissing nimrod to go and blow hisowndamnse'f up? I mean, really??? :mad::mad::vomit::wtf::vomit::confused::mad::mad::cool::cool::cool:

Well, you certainly got on the right side of the pandemic. :wtf: What would your results be without that? For example, Sharpe?

You have two choices -- there is A) ____________________ and there is B) "A kick in the nuts." If you *willingly* choose a kick in the nuts, what does that tell you about choice A? :confused: "Answer is simple, use the math." :wtf: Indeed. :cool:

Not hardly. Pennies are pennies because no one else will have them. :confused: $Revenues/$Regulatory_Burden is ridiculously high. IB is simply throwing in a tiny, tiny little trading hurdle, to keep out the high-cost, needy, "whiny little bitches" who might be tempted to pay Tim Sykes slip fees.

Nine steps, each very dependent on what had transpired in the prior step,....... • Model market. (Form a statement of "How things work" against available evidence.) • Assess model strengths. (e.g., "robust" profit generation) (Separately then,...) • Assess model weaknesses. (e.g., minimum loss...